IB Psychology HL Topic 2 — Models of Development Paper 1 & 2 Cognitive approach ~11 min read

Piaget’s Stages of Cognitive Development

Piaget’s big claim is easy to state and easy to underestimate: young children do not think like adults with less information — they think in a different way altogether. Get that idea, and every one of his strange little tasks suddenly makes sense.

📘 What you need to know

Schemas: the file system in a child’s head

A schema is a mental folder. A toddler who has met three dogs has a “dog” folder: four legs, fur, wags. New information gets handled in one of two ways:

The two processes Assimilation = fitting a new experience into a schema you already have.
Accommodation = changing the schema because the new experience will not fit.

The child sees a horse and calls it a dog. That is assimilation — forcing the new animal into the old folder. When somebody says “no, that is a horse, it is much bigger and people ride it”, the child splits the folder in two. That is accommodation. Piaget called this whole framework genetic epistemology: knowledge grows from an inborn drive to explore, unfolding along an age-related sequence.

Assimilation keeps the filing system as it is. Accommodation redesigns it. Every child does both all day long, and the redesigning is where real development happens.

The four stages

Piaget’s four stages, in order the ages are approximate, the order never changes Sensorimotor Pre-operational Concrete operational Formal operational 0 to 2 years 2 to 7 years 7 to 11 years 11 years and up objects still exist sees only own view logic with real things logic with ideas Each stage adds a new kind of thinking, not just more facts. A child cannot skip a stage, and no amount of teaching pulls them forward early.
Learn the bottom row and you have a one-word summary of each stage. The ages are averages — real children arrive early or late.

Sensorimotor (0–2 years)

The child explores through the body and the senses. The landmark here is object permanence — understanding that things still exist when you cannot see them — usually around 8 months. It is tested with the A-not-B task: hide a toy under cloth A several times, then hide it under cloth B while the child watches. A child who keeps searching at A has not fully grasped object permanence.

Pre-operational (2–7 years)

The most heavily researched stage, because so much changes so fast. Schemas get more sophisticated, pretend play arrives, and children treat objects as if they were alive (anthropomorphism). Three limits define the stage:

Concrete operational (7–11 years)

Now the child can conserve volume, mass and number, can decentre and can classify properly. Logic works well — but only on real, concrete things in front of them. Systematic problem-solving strategies are still shaky.

Formal operational (11+ years)

Abstract reasoning arrives: hypotheses, systematic scientific thinking, relativism and arguing about ideas that have no physical form at all. This is the stage that makes IB essays possible.

The conservation task

This is the most useful single task to know, because you can describe it in four lines and it demonstrates the whole pre-operational to concrete-operational shift.

Conservation of liquid nothing is added, nothing is taken away — only the shape changes pour same amount still the same amount Child, age 4: “the tall one has more!” Fail = judging by appearance. Pass = judging by logic. To pass, the child must mentally pour it back — a reverse operation.
The trick is that the tall glass genuinely does look like more. Passing means trusting logic over what your eyes are telling you.

🧩 How the conservation task is run

  1. Show equal amounts — two identical glasses of liquid, or two equal balls of clay, or two equal rows of coins, side by side.
  2. Ask first — “does this one have more, does that one have more, or are they the same?” The child should say the same.
  3. Transform one, while the child watches — pour into a taller glass, flatten one clay ball, spread out one row of coins.
  4. Ask again — exactly the same question.
  5. Score it — “one has more now” is a fail (appearance beat logic). “Still the same” is a pass (the child can perform the reverse operation).

Two more classic tasks

TaskWhat the child is shownThe questionWhat passing proves
Three mountains (Piaget & Inhelder, 1956)A model landscape of three mountains, with a doll placed on the far side“What does the doll see?” The child picks from several picturesDecentring — around 4 they choose their own view; by 7 or 8 they choose the doll’s
Class inclusionA bunch of flowers made of five daffodils and three poppies“Are there more daffodils or more flowers?”Hierarchy — understanding daffodils are a subcategory of flowers
Why these tasks matter for marks. Each one tests a milestone, and each has a clean pass and fail. If you can state the set-up, the question and what a pass shows, you can answer almost any question on Piaget’s methods.

Evaluating Piaget’s theory

Strengths

Limitations

Link to concepts

Exam practice

WORKED EXAMPLE

Describe one method used to study cognitive development. [3 marks]

1. Name it Piaget’s conservation task. 2. Procedure in one breath Two equal glasses of liquid, ask if they are the same, pour one into a taller glass while the child watches, ask again. 3. What the answer tells you “The tall one has more” = fail, showing the child judges by appearance and is still pre-operational. Name + procedure + interpretation The pour must happen in front of the child. Leave that out and the task proves nothing.
WORKED EXAMPLE

Discuss one model of cognitive development. [ERQ paragraph]

Claim Piaget’s stage theory is testable, which is a real strength for a developmental model. Evidence The three mountains task produces a consistent shift: around age 4 children pick their own view, by 7 or 8 they pick the doll’s. Counter However the task is culturally loaded — a mountain landscape is unfamiliar to many children — so failure may reflect the materials, not the child’s thinking. Judgement The stages describe a real sequence, but the tasks may underestimate children from other backgrounds. Claim, evidence, counter, judgement “Culture bias” only earns marks when you say exactly which part of the task is biased.

💡 Exam tip

⚠️ Common mix-up

Up next: Theory of Mind: Understanding Other Minds — a much sharper test of the same idea Piaget was chasing with the three mountains: when does a child realise other people know different things?

Want this explained one-to-one?

Book a free session with an experienced IB Psychology tutor and get your trickiest topics made simple.

Book a Free Session →