IB ESS HL Topic 2 — Ecology Paper 1 & 2 HL only ~9 min read

The Niche a Species Could Fill, and the One It Does

A niche is not a place. It is a species’ whole way of making a living: what it eats, what conditions it can stand, when it is active and what it needs to breed. The HL twist is that the niche a species could occupy is nearly always bigger than the one it actually gets, because competitors are in the way.

📚 What you need to know

Habitat is the address, niche is the job

This one sentence solves most niche questions. A badger’s habitat is the woodland. Its niche is being a nocturnal omnivore that digs setts in well-drained soil, eats earthworms and fruit, and breeds in late winter. Two species can share a habitat quite happily. They cannot share a niche.

The two definitions fundamental niche = what a species could use
realised niche = what it actually uses

Fundamental and realised niches on a shore

The classic study is on barnacles. Some species can survive across almost the whole rocky shore, from the high-tide mark down to the low-tide mark, because they tolerate a wide range of temperature and salinity and will settle on many surfaces. That whole range is their fundamental niche.

In reality they are only found on the upper part of the shore. Lower down, a larger barnacle species grows faster and takes the space. The smaller species is squeezed into the upper zone, where it has to put up with longer periods out of the water — but where the competitor cannot survive. That squeezed band is its realised niche.

The niche a species could have, and the one it gets the same shore, with and without a competitor FUNDAMENTAL high tide low tide species A REALISED high tide low tide species A species B The realised niche is always the same size or smaller than the fundamental one. Remove the competitor and species A spreads back down the shore.
The upper shore is the harsher place to live. Species A survives there not because it prefers it, but because that is where the competitor cannot follow.
A neat way to remember it: the fundamental niche is what your CV says you could do; the realised niche is the job you actually got once everyone else had applied too.

Competitive exclusion

If two species need exactly the same resources in exactly the same way, one of them will always be slightly better at getting them. That species gets more food, breeds more successfully, and its numbers rise while the other’s fall. There are only three possible endings:

This is why the statement “no two species occupy the same niche” is not just an observation. It is the outcome of competition doing its work.

Sharing a habitat by splitting the resources

Species that look like they should be in direct competition usually turn out to be doing subtly different things. Several warbler species live in the same conifer trees and eat the same kinds of insect, yet they coexist because each feeds in a different part of the tree.

Same tree, three different niches splitting a resource lets similar species live side by side high middle low species 1 feeds at the tips species 2 feeds mid-branch species 3 feeds near the base One habitat, three niches, almost no competition. Each species has a realised niche narrower than what it could tolerate.
Looking at the birds alone, you would say they share a niche. Watching where they feed shows three separate niches inside one habitat.

Worked examples

WORKED EXAMPLE

Applying the idea to a new species

In laboratory tanks, a freshwater shrimp survives at temperatures from 4 °C to 26 °C. In the river where it lives it is only found in stretches above 18 °C, where a second shrimp species is absent. Identify the fundamental and realised niches and explain the difference. [4]

Step 1: the fundamental niche the full range it could tolerate with nothing in the way fundamental niche: 4 °C to 26 °C Step 2: the realised niche the narrower range where it is actually found in the river realised niche: above 18 °C Step 3: the reason the second species outcompetes it in the cooler stretches the lab result gives the fundamental niche because competitors are removed
WORKED EXAMPLE

Predicting the effect of removing a competitor

A disease wipes out species B from the lower shore. Predict what happens to species A and justify your answer. [3]

Step 1: what was limiting species A competition for space with species B, not the physical conditions Step 2: the prediction species A spreads down into the lower shore Step 3: the justification the lower shore was already inside its fundamental niche, so it can survive there the realised niche expands towards the fundamental niche never say the fundamental niche gets bigger — only the realised one changes

💡 Exam tip

⚠ Common mix-up

Up next: Life Cycles and Survivorship Curves — the last HL page, on the two very different strategies species use to stay in the game.

Want this explained one-to-one?

Book a free session with an experienced IB ESS tutor and get your trickiest topics made simple.

Book a Free Session →