IB Biology HL Populations & Communities Paper 1 & 2 ~13 min read

Interspecific Competition

When two species want the same things, one of them usually does it slightly better. The loser does not simply die out — it gets pushed into a smaller corner of the habitat. That squeeze has a name, a testable prediction, and a very visible example running through British woodland right now.

📘 What you need to know

Fundamental and realised niches

If a species is outcompeted, it is forced out of its niche into an alternative niche. That is competitive exclusion, and it produces two niches worth naming.

The same species, squeezed A rocky shore, from the low tide mark to the high oneNO COMPETITOR PRESENT FUNDAMENTAL NICHE — the full range it could occupyCOMPETITOR PRESENT REALISED NICHE TAKEN BY A RIVALThe species did not change — its neighbours did If it cannot retreat into any remaining space, it goes locally extinct.
The realised niche is always the same size or smaller than the fundamental niche. Remove the competitor and the species should expand back — which is exactly what the test below relies on.

Testing for interspecific competition

The competitive exclusion effect gives you a way to test whether competition is happening. Remove one species and see whether the other’s distribution changes.

🧩 The two ways to run the test

  1. In the lab: culture two bacterial species on their own and then together, measuring how this affects population size or colony distribution.
  2. In the field: first carry out random quadrat samples, recording the presence or absence of one or both species at different locations around the habitat.
  3. Then remove one species from a small area (this is the manipulation).
  4. Measure the effect this has on the distribution of the second species.
  5. If the distribution changes, competition was likely taking place. If removal has no effect, distribution is probably down to another factor.
Read this next sentence twice, because it is the sort of precision that separates a 6 from a 7. This effect does not prove the presence of interspecific competition — it only indicates that it could be occurring. Something else may have changed at the same time. Science indicates; it rarely proves.

Nature of science: experiments and observations

A hypothesis is a proposed explanation for an observation that can be tested by scientific investigation. As the test above shows, hypotheses can be tested in a laboratory or in the field, and the two have opposite strengths.

 LaboratoryField
ConditionsControlled, on a small scaleA real–life setting, on a large scale
ExampleGrowing bacteria in a lab, or plants in a greenhouseGrowth of plants in a forest, or species distribution on a rocky shore
Control of variablesHigh — only the independent variable is changedNot possible to control factors beyond the independent variable
WeaknessResults can never be directly applied to a real–life situation; organisms may not behave as they do naturallyMay not give a perfectly valid set of results, and is very hard to replicate exactly
StrengthConfident that the independent variable caused the effectA more realistic representation of the real world

Invasive species

An invasive species is a non–native species that causes harm to the environment into which it has been introduced. They are sometimes called alien species.

Invasion can happen naturally when a species migrates or expands its habitat, but most recorded incidents are caused by humans:

Why they spread so fast. In a new ecosystem an invasive species has little or none of the natural population controls that existed in its previous one — no natural predators or competitors. As a result it can increase in number at a rapid rate.
Effect on the ecosystemWhat happens
CompetitionOccurs between the invasive species and native species occupying a similar niche, with the native species displaced or pushed to extinction
PredationMany invasive species are successful predators, causing a massive decline in their prey species
DiseaseInvasive species can introduce new diseases to which native species have no natural immunity
One species replacing another Grey and red squirrels in the same woodland GREY RISING RED FALLINGpopulation size time / years grey squirrel red squirrelInterspecific competition, playing out in real time UK red squirrel numbers are not at zero, and are recovering in some places.
Grey squirrels were introduced to the UK from North America in the 1800s. They have been highly successful and have largely outcompeted the native red squirrel.

Endemic species

Endemic species are found in a particular place and in no other location in the world. The Scottish crossbill is found in the conifer forests of Scotland and nowhere else, so it is endemic to Scotland.

Endemic species are especially vulnerable to invasive species, for a stark reason: local extinction means the species has gone entirely extinct. There is no population elsewhere to recolonise from.

Australia: the case studyDetail
Why it has so many endemicsIts species evolved over many years of isolation from other continents
The invasive predatorsThe European red fox, introduced in the 1800s by settlers for fox hunting, and the domestic cat, likely travelling on ships and introduced by accident
The scale of the damageEvidence suggests more than 10 % of Australia’s endemic mammal species have already gone extinct since European settlers arrived
Who is worst affectedSmall mammals, being the best food source for the invasive predators
What is leftSome species now survive only on islands around mainland Australia where foxes and cats have not yet arrived

Worked examples

WE 1

Fundamental and realised niches

Distinguish between the fundamental niche and the realised niche of a species. (2 marks)

Point 1: fundamental The ideal niche a species could occupy in the absence of competition. Point 2: realised The smaller niche it actually occupies once a better–adapted competitor has forced it out of part of its range, through competitive exclusion. What it could occupy, versus what it is left with the realised niche is never larger than the fundamental one
WE 2

Interpreting a removal experiment

A researcher removes barnacle species A from part of a rocky shore. Species B then spreads into that area. Evaluate what this shows. (3 marks)

Point 1: what it indicates Species B expanded into space it previously did not occupy, which indicates that interspecific competition with species A may have been restricting its distribution. Point 2: the niches Species B was previously confined to its realised niche and has now expanded towards its fundamental niche. Point 3: the limitation This does not prove competition was occurring. Other factors may have changed at the same time, so the result only indicates competition could be taking place. Strong evidence, not proof “evaluate” is asking for the limitation — do not stop at the conclusion
WE 3

Why invasive species spread

Explain why an introduced species is often able to increase in number far more rapidly in its new habitat than in its native one. (3 marks)

Point 1: controls are missing In the new ecosystem it has little or none of the natural population controls that existed in its previous ecosystem. Point 2: name them In particular it has no natural predators and no established competitors adapted to compete with it. Point 3: the consequence With few density–dependent factors limiting it, survival and reproduction are high, so numbers increase at a rapid rate and native species occupying a similar niche may be displaced. No predators, no competitors, no brakes tying this back to density–dependent factors shows the examiner you have linked the unit together

💡 Exam tips

⚠ Common mistakes

Up next: Chi–Squared Test (Skills). You have just seen that two species can be found in different parts of a habitat. The final page is the statistics that tell you whether that pattern is real or just chance.

Want this explained one-to-one?

Book a free session with an experienced IB Biology tutor and get your trickiest topics made simple.

Book a Free Session →