IB Business Management SL Topic 8 — The Pre-Released Statement Paper 1 Toolkit ~10 min read

Bringing Decision Trees Into Your Answers

A decision tree puts numbers on a choice. You estimate what each outcome is worth, how likely it is, and what the option costs, then compare. The maths takes a minute. The mistake that costs most marks is forgetting to subtract the cost at the end.

What you need to know

The two formulas

Expected monetary value EMV = (probability × outcome) + (probability × outcome) Net gain Net gain = EMV − cost of the option
If a question gives you a cost and you never use it, you have almost certainly missed the last mark. Cross the cost off the paper once you have subtracted it.

A worked tree for ABC

Suppose ABC has $50m of finance available and two ways to use it. Here are the estimates its managers have come up with.

Two options, priced up Square is the decision, circles are chance Decision A: Second e-waste plant Cost $50m B: Upgrade concrete plants Cost $30m 0.55 gives $110m 0.45 gives $30m 0.70 gives $70m 0.30 gives $40m EMV $74m Net gain $24m EMV $61m Net gain $31m B wins on net gain, even though A has the higher EMV The cost is what flips the answer Compare net gains, never raw expected values, or you will pick the wrong option
Option A looks better until you take the $50m off. This is the single most common slip in decision tree questions.
WORKED EXAMPLE

Using the estimates above, recommend which option ABC should choose. Justify your answer. [4]

Step 1: EMV of Option A (0.55 × $110m) + (0.45 × $30m) = $60.5m + $13.5m = $74m [1] Step 2: EMV of Option B (0.70 × $70m) + (0.30 × $40m) = $49m + $12m = $61m [1] Step 3: take off the cost of each A: $74m − $50m = $24m net gain B: $61m − $30m = $31m net gain [1] Step 4: recommend Choose B: upgrading the concrete plants [1] Say why: B has the higher net gain ($31m against $24m) and the lower cost, so it is also the safer use of the finance.

Where ABC could actually use one

The evaluation writes itself. Every one of ABC’s decisions depends on a number nobody can know: the future gold price, how much e-waste gets collected, whether a recession arrives. That is exactly the limitation of a decision tree, and it is a strong closing point in a discuss answer.

Strengths and limitations

Why managers use themWhy they should not rely on them
Drawing the tree can reveal options that nobody had thought about.The probabilities are forecasts. If ABC guesses the chance of strong gold prices wrongly, every number after it is wrong too.
Managers are forced to put a figure on risk instead of talking vaguely about it.External shocks such as a recession or a new emissions law are hard to build into a probability.
It gives a clear financial comparison between very different options, like recycling and concrete.Qualitative factors are left out entirely. Reputation, employee morale and CSR do not appear anywhere in the maths.
The research needed to produce the estimates is useful in itself.Time lag. By the time ABC builds the plant, the conditions the tree assumed may have changed.
WORKED EXAMPLE

Explain one limitation of using a decision tree to choose between these two options. [2]

Step 1: the point A decision tree only includes outcomes that can be given a money value, so qualitative factors are ignored [1] Step 2: apply it Expanding e-waste recycling would improve ABC’s reputation and CSR profile with governments and investors, but none of that appears in the $24m figure, so the tree understates the value of Option A [1] 2 marks A limitation question is not an invitation to say “the numbers might be wrong” and stop. Say which number, and why it matters here.

Exam tip

Common mix-up

Up next: Bringing Circular Business Models Into Your Answers — the idea that ties ABC’s two businesses into one story.

Want this explained one-to-one?

Book a free session with an experienced IB Business Management tutor and get your trickiest topics made simple.

Book a Free Session →