IB Chemistry SL Topic 2 — From Models to Materials Paper 1 & 2 Core idea ~11 min read

Comparing Bonding Models

Ionic, covalent, metallic. Three tidy boxes, and most substances drop neatly into one of them. Then you meet aluminium chloride — a metal joined to a non-metal that melts at a temperature you could reach in a school oven. This page is about what the three models are for, where they run out, and how one simple triangle fills the gap.

📘 What you need to know

The three models in one place

A model is a picture you use to make a prediction. Each bonding model starts with a different assumption about what happens to the outer electrons, and each one leads to a different set of properties. Learn the chain in that order — picture, then prediction — and you can rebuild the properties from scratch instead of memorising lists.

The three bonding models Each one is an extreme. Most real substances sit somewhere between them. IONIC COVALENT METALLIC + − + − + − + − + one shared pair + + + + + + + + +electrons handed over giant lattice of ions electrons shared held between two atoms electrons let loose cations in a sea of themThree clean pictures, and three sets of predictions that follow from them. The trouble starts with substances that behave like a blend of two of these.
Notice that the only real difference is what the outer electrons are doing. Everything else — melting point, conductivity, brittleness — follows from that one choice.
ModelWhat the model assumesTypical exampleWhat it predicts
IonicOuter electrons are transferred from metal to non-metal, giving oppositely charged ions in a giant latticeMagnesium oxide, MgOVery high melting point, brittle, conducts only when molten or dissolved
CovalentA pair of electrons is shared between two non-metal atomsChlorine, Cl2Low melting point if simple molecules, no conductivity, often soluble in non-polar solvents
MetallicOuter electrons are delocalised across a lattice of cationsMagnesium, MgConducts as a solid, malleable, usually high melting point
If you can only remember one line from this page, make it this one: the model is not the substance. The model is a prediction machine, and every prediction machine has a range where it works.

Where the models break down

Take aluminium chloride. Aluminium is a metal, chlorine is a non-metal, so the ionic model says: giant lattice of Al3+ and Cl−, melting point in the hundreds or thousands of degrees, conducts when molten. The reality is that AlCl3 turns to vapour at around 180–190 °C and is a poor conductor. A giant ionic lattice does not behave like that.

So what went wrong? The Al3+ ion is tiny and carries three positive charges, which makes it an extremely strong puller of electron density. It drags the outer electron cloud of each chloride ion back towards itself. The electrons never fully leave aluminium’s control — they end up somewhere between transferred and shared. Chemists call that covalent character, and it is why the bonding in AlCl3 is better described as polar covalent than as ionic.

The general rule: small, highly charged cations distort nearby anions, and large anions are easy to distort. Both effects push a compound away from pure ionic and towards covalent character.

The two numbers that fix a substance’s place

To stop guessing, chemists use electronegativity — a number for how strongly an atom in a bond pulls the shared electrons towards itself. Two things are done with those numbers, and each one answers a different question.

The two numbers Δχ = χA − χB     and     average χ = ( χA + χB ) ÷ 2

That second idea is the one students skip, and it is the one that makes the triangle make sense. A small difference on its own does not tell you anything. Sodium and sodium have a difference of zero. Chlorine and chlorine also have a difference of zero. One is a soft conductor, the other is a poisonous gas. The average is what separates them.

🧩 How to place any substance

  1. Look up both electronegativities in Section 9 of the data booklet. Never guess them.
  2. Subtract the smaller from the larger to get Δχ. It is always positive.
  3. Add and halve to get the average.
  4. Plot the point as (average, difference) — average along the bottom, difference up the side.
  5. Read off the region you have landed in, and say what that means for the bonding.

The bonding triangle

Plot those two numbers for every substance you can think of and the points fill a triangle. Each corner is one of the three perfect models, and everything real lives inside.

The bonding triangle Two numbers in, one bonding description out. IONIC POLAR COVALENT COVALENT METALLIC0 1.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0Δχ difference in electronegativity average electronegativity of the two elementsΔχ ≈ 1.8 Δχ ≈ 0.4Up the side: how unevenly. Along the bottom: how tightly. A simplified sketch. Use the booklet version in the exam, and treat the borders as fuzzy.
The dashed lines are rough guides, not hard walls. A point just below a border is not a different kind of substance from a point just above it — the whole point of the triangle is that bonding changes gradually.

Reading it is a two-step job. Go along the bottom to find the average, then up to find the difference, then look at where you have landed. Low average and low difference puts you bottom left, in metallic territory. High average and low difference puts you bottom right, covalent. A large difference lifts you towards the apex and the bonding becomes ionic.

Worked examples

WORKED EXAMPLE

Place magnesium oxide on the bonding triangle.

Use χ(Mg) = 1.3 and χ(O) = 3.4 from Section 9 of the data booklet.

Step 1: find the difference Δχ = 3.4 − 1.3 = 2.1 Step 2: find the average (3.4 + 1.3) ÷ 2 = 4.7 ÷ 2 = 2.35 Step 3: plot and read Go to 2.35 along the bottom, then up to 2.1. That is high up near the apex. Ionic region — MgO is close to a pure ionic compound and that fits: MgO melts above 2800 °C, exactly what a strong ionic lattice should do
WORKED EXAMPLE

Where does hydrogen chloride sit, and what does that tell you?

Use χ(H) = 2.2 and χ(Cl) = 3.2.

Step 1: the two numbers Δχ = 3.2 − 2.2 = 1.0 average = (3.2 + 2.2) ÷ 2 = 2.7 Step 2: read the position High average, middling difference → middle-right of the triangle. Polar covalent — a shared pair, but pulled towards Cl so HCl is a molecule, not a lattice, and the H end carries a small positive charge
WORKED EXAMPLE

Magnesium metal and chlorine gas both have Δχ = 0. Why do they end up at opposite ends of the triangle?

Step 1: both are elements Every atom is identical, so the difference must be zero. Both sit on the bottom edge. Step 2: compare the averages Mg: (1.3 + 1.3) ÷ 2 = 1.3 Cl: (3.2 + 3.2) ÷ 2 = 3.2 Step 3: what a low or high average means Mg atoms hold their outer electrons weakly, so the electrons delocalise. Cl atoms grip hard, so the electrons stay in a shared pair. Mg lands bottom left (metallic), Cl2 lands bottom right (covalent) the difference tells you how fair the sharing is; the average tells you whether there is any sharing at all

💡 Exam tip

⚠ Common mix-up

Up next: Bonding and Physical Properties — now that you can place a substance on the triangle, we use that position to predict melting points, conductivity and solubility, and see the one thing the triangle cannot tell you.

Want this explained one-to-one?

Book a free session with an experienced IB Chemistry tutor and get your trickiest topics made simple.

Book a Free Session →