IB Psychology HLTopic 2 — Models of DevelopmentPaper 1 & 2Cognitive approach~11 min read
Piaget’s Stages of Cognitive Development
Piaget’s big claim is easy to state and easy to underestimate: young children do not think like adults with less information — they think in a different way altogether. Get that idea, and every one of his strange little tasks suddenly makes sense.
📘 What you need to know
Children’s thinking is qualitatively different from adults’ — different in kind, not just in amount.
Development is maturational: the stages follow a biological timetable and always come in the same order.
Children learn by exploring, like little scientists — this is discovery learning.
Schemas are mental frameworks for organising information; they grow through assimilation and accommodation.
Four stages: sensorimotor, pre-operational, concrete operational, formal operational.
Key tasks: object permanence, conservation, the three mountains task, and class inclusion.
A schema is a mental folder. A toddler who has met three dogs has a “dog” folder: four legs, fur, wags. New information gets handled in one of two ways:
The two processes
Assimilation = fitting a new experience into a schema you already have.
Accommodation = changing the schema because the new experience will not fit.
The child sees a horse and calls it a dog. That is assimilation — forcing the new animal into the old folder. When somebody says “no, that is a horse, it is much bigger and people ride it”, the child splits the folder in two. That is accommodation. Piaget called this whole framework genetic epistemology: knowledge grows from an inborn drive to explore, unfolding along an age-related sequence.
Assimilation keeps the filing system as it is. Accommodation redesigns it. Every child does both all day long, and the redesigning is where real development happens.
The four stages
Learn the bottom row and you have a one-word summary of each stage. The ages are averages — real children arrive early or late.
Sensorimotor (0–2 years)
The child explores through the body and the senses. The landmark here is object permanence — understanding that things still exist when you cannot see them — usually around 8 months. It is tested with the A-not-B task: hide a toy under cloth A several times, then hide it under cloth B while the child watches. A child who keeps searching at A has not fully grasped object permanence.
Pre-operational (2–7 years)
The most heavily researched stage, because so much changes so fast. Schemas get more sophisticated, pretend play arrives, and children treat objects as if they were alive (anthropomorphism). Three limits define the stage:
Egocentrism — cannot see a situation from another person’s point of view.
Failure to conserve — thinks the amount changes when the appearance changes.
No class inclusion — cannot hold that one object belongs to a small category and a bigger one at the same time.
Concrete operational (7–11 years)
Now the child can conserve volume, mass and number, can decentre and can classify properly. Logic works well — but only on real, concrete things in front of them. Systematic problem-solving strategies are still shaky.
Formal operational (11+ years)
Abstract reasoning arrives: hypotheses, systematic scientific thinking, relativism and arguing about ideas that have no physical form at all. This is the stage that makes IB essays possible.
The conservation task
This is the most useful single task to know, because you can describe it in four lines and it demonstrates the whole pre-operational to concrete-operational shift.
The trick is that the tall glass genuinely does look like more. Passing means trusting logic over what your eyes are telling you.
🧩 How the conservation task is run
Show equal amounts — two identical glasses of liquid, or two equal balls of clay, or two equal rows of coins, side by side.
Ask first — “does this one have more, does that one have more, or are they the same?” The child should say the same.
Transform one, while the child watches — pour into a taller glass, flatten one clay ball, spread out one row of coins.
Ask again — exactly the same question.
Score it — “one has more now” is a fail (appearance beat logic). “Still the same” is a pass (the child can perform the reverse operation).
Two more classic tasks
Task
What the child is shown
The question
What passing proves
Three mountains (Piaget & Inhelder, 1956)
A model landscape of three mountains, with a doll placed on the far side
“What does the doll see?” The child picks from several pictures
Decentring — around 4 they choose their own view; by 7 or 8 they choose the doll’s
Class inclusion
A bunch of flowers made of five daffodils and three poppies
“Are there more daffodils or more flowers?”
Hierarchy — understanding daffodils are a subcategory of flowers
Why these tasks matter for marks. Each one tests a milestone, and each has a clean pass and fail. If you can state the set-up, the question and what a pass shows, you can answer almost any question on Piaget’s methods.
Evaluating Piaget’s theory
Strengths
Highly testable. The tasks are simple, standardised and easy to repeat with new children, so the theory can be checked experimentally and the findings are reliable.
Groundbreaking. Piaget shifted psychology towards taking children’s thinking seriously in its own right, and set off decades of research.
Limitations
Ignores language. Piaget gives language almost no role, which makes the account incomplete — and it is precisely where Vygotsky attacks him.
Weak original evidence. His early ideas came from a small, biased sample of Swiss children and informal observation rather than robust methods.
Task design may underestimate children. The tasks demand memory and unusual wording, so a child may fail for reasons that have nothing to do with the concept being tested.
Link to concepts
Bias — there is clear culture bias. The three mountains task assumes a Swiss mountain landscape, unfamiliar to children from flat regions, and conservation tasks build in Western ideas about volume, mass and number.
Responsibility — research with children needs informed consent from parents or guardians, protection from distress, and careful wording, since children do not interpret instructions the way adults do.
Exam practice
WORKED EXAMPLE
Describe one method used to study cognitive development. [3 marks]
1. Name it
Piaget’s conservation task.
2. Procedure in one breath
Two equal glasses of liquid, ask if they are the same, pour one into a taller glass while the child watches, ask again.
3. What the answer tells you“The tall one has more” = fail, showing the child judges by appearance and is still pre-operational.
Name + procedure + interpretationThe pour must happen in front of the child. Leave that out and the task proves nothing.
WORKED EXAMPLE
Discuss one model of cognitive development. [ERQ paragraph]
Claim
Piaget’s stage theory is testable, which is a real strength for a developmental model.
Evidence
The three mountains task produces a consistent shift: around age 4 children pick their own view, by 7 or 8 they pick the doll’s.
CounterHowever the task is culturally loaded — a mountain landscape is unfamiliar to many children — so failure may reflect the materials, not the child’s thinking.
Judgement
The stages describe a real sequence, but the tasks may underestimate children from other backgrounds.
Claim, evidence, counter, judgement“Culture bias” only earns marks when you say exactly which part of the task is biased.
💡 Exam tip
Memorise the stages in order with one keyword each: objects, viewpoint, real things, ideas.
Give ages as approximate. Writing “exactly at 7” invites the examiner to disagree with you.
Use Vygotsky as your built-in evaluation of Piaget, and Piaget as your evaluation of Vygotsky.
For any task question, always finish with what passing proves. That sentence is usually the mark.
Qualitatively different is Piaget’s phrase. Using it shows you understand the core claim.
If a question asks about research methods, note that much of Piaget’s early work was observation of a small sample, not controlled experiments.
⚠️ Common mix-up
Assimilation and accommodation swapped. Assimilation keeps the schema; accommodation changes it.
Egocentrism is not selfishness. It means being unable to take another viewpoint, not being unkind.
Conservation is not conservation of energy or nature. It means the amount stays the same when the look changes.
Do not swap the pass and fail. “Still the same” is the pass. Students reverse this under pressure surprisingly often.
Object permanence is roughly 8 months, not 8 years or 8 weeks.
Formal operational is not guaranteed. Piaget said it begins around 11 — not that every adult reaches it in every subject.
Up next: Theory of Mind: Understanding Other Minds — a much sharper test of the same idea Piaget was chasing with the three mountains: when does a child realise other people know different things?
Want this explained one-to-one?
Book a free session with an experienced IB Psychology tutor and get your trickiest topics made simple.