IB Chemistry SL Topic 4 — Energy Cycles Paper 1 & 2 Core idea ~11 min read

Hess’s Law

Plenty of enthalpy changes cannot be measured. You cannot make propane by shaking carbon and hydrogen together, and you cannot burn carbon and get it to stop politely at carbon monoxide. Hess’s law gets you the number anyway, by sending the reaction round a route you can measure.

📚 What you need to know

The law itself

Hess’s law the total enthalpy change of a reaction is independent of the route taken,
provided the initial and final conditions are the same

That sounds like a rule someone decided on. It is not — it is forced on us by conservation of energy, and the argument is worth following once.

Suppose two different routes from the same reactants to the same products released different amounts of energy. You could then go forwards along the generous route, come back along the mean one, and finish exactly where you started with energy left over in your hand. Repeat forever and you have made energy out of nothing. Since that is impossible, every route between the same two points must give the same ΔH.

Think of walking up a mountain. Whichever path you take, the altitude gained between the car park and the summit is identical — even though one path is longer, steeper, or more scenic. Enthalpy behaves like altitude: only where you start and where you finish matter.

This is what makes enthalpy so useful. It depends only on the state of the chemicals, not on their history, so we are free to invent whatever imaginary route makes the arithmetic possible. That is exactly what the previous page did: breaking everything into separated atoms and rebuilding is just a Hess’s law route in disguise.

Building an enthalpy cycle

AN ENTHALPY CYCLEtwo routes from the same start to the same finishREACTANTSPRODUCTSINTERMEDIATEΔHDIRECT ROUTEΔH₁ΔH₂ΔH = ΔH₁ + ΔH₂the long way round has to arrive at the same answer
The reaction you want goes along the top. The route you have data for goes underneath. Both must total the same.

🧩 How to draw one

  1. Write the target reaction across the top, reactants on the left, products on the right, with the arrow you are trying to label.
  2. Look at the data given. Find the common substance that both sides can be connected to — usually the elements, or carbon dioxide and water.
  3. Put that substance in a box underneath.
  4. Draw arrows in the direction the given reactions actually go, and write their ΔH values on them.
  5. Trace the long way round from reactants to products, adding or subtracting as you go.

Step 4 is the one to be fussy about. The arrows record the direction of the reactions you were given, not the direction you intend to walk. You are perfectly allowed to walk backwards up an arrow — you just pay for it with a sign change.

READING THE ARROWSyour route runs WITH the arrowADD the ΔHyour route runs AGAINST the arrowSUBTRACT the ΔHthe solid arrows show the reactions you were given, not the way you travel
The only rule you need for a cycle. With the arrow, add. Against the arrow, subtract.
Keep the operation and the sign apart. Going against an arrow whose value is –283 means subtracting a negative number: – (–283) = +283. Write the brackets in. Almost every lost mark in this topic lives in that one line.

Cycles in action

WORKED EXAMPLE

Given S(s) + O2(g) → SO2(g), ΔH = –297 kJ mol–1 and SO2(g) + ½O2(g) → SO3(g), ΔH = –98 kJ mol–1, find ΔH for S(s) + 1½O2(g) → SO3(g).

Step 1 — check the route S → SO₂ → SO₃. Both given reactions point the way we want to travel. Step 2 — add them, both with the arrows ΔH = (−297) + (−98) ΔH = −395 kJ mol⁻¹ Check the oxygen balances: 1 + ½ = 1½. If the atoms do not add up, the route is wrong.

That one was gentle because both arrows already pointed the right way. The next is the situation examiners actually set: the reaction you want cannot be run at all, and one of your arrows points the wrong way.

A CYCLE FOR A REACTION YOU CANNOT RUNburning carbon never stops neatly at carbon monoxideC(s) + ½O₂(g)CO(g)CO₂(g)ΔH = ?−394burn it fully−283burn the COgo forwards to CO₂, then backwards up to CO
Carbon burning in a limited supply of oxygen gives a mixture, never pure CO, so this enthalpy change has to be reached indirectly.
WORKED EXAMPLE

Given C(s) + O2(g) → CO2(g), ΔH = –394 kJ mol–1 and CO(g) + ½O2(g) → CO2(g), ΔH = –283 kJ mol–1, calculate ΔH for C(s) + ½O2(g) → CO(g).

Step 1 — find the route Both given reactions end at CO₂, so put CO₂ at the bottom of the cycle. Step 2 — walk it C down to CO₂ is WITH the arrow, so add. CO₂ up to CO is AGAINST the arrow, so subtract. ΔH = (−394) − (−283) = −394 + 283 ΔH = −111 kJ mol⁻¹ Sensible? Burning carbon only part of the way should release less than burning it fully, and 111 is smaller than 394. It is.
WORKED EXAMPLE

For N2(g) + O2(g) → 2NO(g), ΔH = +180 kJ. What is ΔH for NO(g) → ½N2(g) + ½O2(g)?

Step 1 — reverse it 2NO → N₂ + O₂ is the given reaction backwards, so flip the sign. ΔH = −180 kJ Step 2 — halve it The question wants 1 mol of NO, not 2. Halve the equation, halve the enthalpy. −180 ÷ 2 = −90 ΔH = −90 kJ Two separate adjustments, done in either order. Reversing changes the sign; scaling changes the size.

💡 Exam tip

⚠️ Common mix-up

Up next: Applying Hess’s Law — the same idea reduced to three standard set-ups that between them cover almost every question you will be asked.

Want this explained one-to-one?

Book a free session with an experienced IB Chemistry tutor and get your trickiest topics made simple.

Book a Free Session →