IB Chemistry HL Topic 7 — Tool 2: Technology IA & Practical Practical skill ~10 min read

Using Technology to Process Data

Collecting six hundred readings is easy. Turning them into something that answers your research question is the part that earns marks. A spreadsheet does the arithmetic; you still have to decide what the arithmetic should be.

📚 What you need to know

What “processing” actually means

Raw data is whatever came out of the instrument. Processed data is what you calculated from it: an average, a difference, a rate, a concentration, an enthalpy change.

An internal assessment that shows only raw data and a graph of raw data will not score well. The examiner wants to see you take the numbers somewhere.

Raw numbers in, meaning out Type the readings once, write the formula once, and the rest is automatic t / s V / cm³ 0 0 10 32 20 48 30 56 rate / cm³ s⁻¹ 3.2 1.6 0.8 RAW DATA CALCULATED GRAPH typed in once one formula, copied down built from the middle column The middle column is the bit examiners are looking for
Keep raw and processed data in separate columns and label both with units. It makes the working obvious without you having to explain it.

The three jobs a spreadsheet does

The real advantage of a spreadsheet is not speed, it is that the working is reproducible. Change one raw reading and every calculated value and every graph updates. Doing it by hand, you would have to start again.

Picking the right kind of graph

Choosing the wrong chart type is a surprisingly common way to lose a mark. The question to ask is what the graph is meant to show.

Three chart types, three different jobs Ask what the graph is meant to show before you pick one LINE / SCATTER BAR CHART PIE CHART trends and correlations comparing categories parts of a whole Continuous variable on both axes? Then it is a line or scatter graph.
Almost every graph in an IB Chemistry internal assessment is a scatter graph with a line of best fit. The other two are rare, so think carefully before using them.
Chart typeUse it whenChemistry example
Scatter with best-fit lineBoth variables are continuousAbsorbance against concentration
Line graphFollowing one quantity over timepH against volume of acid added
Bar chartComparing separate categoriesFirst ionisation energy of Period 3 elements
Pie chartShowing proportions of one totalComposition of a mixture by mass

Calibration curves

A colorimeter measures how much light a coloured solution absorbs. That absorbance depends on concentration, but the instrument does not know the relationship — you have to show it.

So you make up several standard solutions of known concentration, measure the absorbance of each, and plot absorbance against concentration. The line you get is the calibration curve. Any unknown of the same substance can then be read straight off it.

Reading an unknown off a calibration curve Standards first, then the unknown gets read off the line 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 relative absorbance concentration of Ni²⁺ / mol dm⁻³ unknown reads 0.470 so c = 0.55 mol dm⁻³ Across to the line, then straight down to the axis
The gradient of this line is 0.860 per mol dm–3, so 0.470 ÷ 0.860 gives 0.546 mol dm–3. Reading it off the graph and calculating it should agree.
Only read inside your standards. The line was tested between 0 and 1.0 mol dm–3. Extending it out to 2.0 and reading a value off is guessing, because you have no evidence the relationship stays straight out there.

Modelling and 3D visualisation

Computational models let chemists explore processes that would take far too long or cost far too much to investigate experimentally. They are a tool for narrowing down the options before anyone picks up a flask.

The version you are most likely to use is 3D structure visualisation. MolView is a free tool where you draw a structure in two dimensions and immediately see it rotating in three, which makes bond angles and molecular shape far easier to grasp than any flat diagram.

Visualisation is also used for:

The same warning applies as ever: a model is a simplification. It is a good way to build understanding and a bad way to prove something.

🧩 Turning raw readings into a finished graph

  1. Put raw data in its own columns, each with a heading and a unit.
  2. Add a processed column and write the formula once, then copy it down.
  3. Check one value by hand. If the spreadsheet and your calculator disagree, the formula is wrong.
  4. Plot the processed data with the independent variable on the x-axis.
  5. Label both axes with quantity and unit, and add a best-fit line if the relationship is meant to be linear.
  6. Look for outliers before you draw conclusions, and say what you did about any you found.

Worked examples

WORKED EXAMPLE

Using the calibration curve above, a solution of unknown concentration gives a relative absorbance of 0.300. Find its concentration and state one assumption you are making.

Find the gradient of the line The line passes through the origin and through (1.00, 0.858). gradient = 0.858 ÷ 1.00 = 0.860 per mol dm–3 Rearrange for concentration c = absorbance ÷ gradient Substitute c = 0.300 ÷ 0.860 = 0.3488… c = 0.349 mol dm–3 (3 s.f.) assumption: the unknown was measured on the same colorimeter, same wavelength, same cuvette
WORKED EXAMPLE

A student has logged temperature every 0.5 s for 300 s during a neutralisation. Describe how a spreadsheet would be used to find the maximum temperature rise, and say why a graph is still needed.

Organise the data Two columns: time in seconds, temperature in °C. The logger fills them automatically. Manipulate Add a column for temperature rise, using the starting temperature as the reference, copied down all 600 rows. Why a graph is still needed The highest logged value is not the true maximum, because the mixture starts cooling while it is still reacting. What the graph gives you Plot temperature against time, extrapolate the cooling line back to the moment of mixing, and read the corrected rise there. The spreadsheet does the arithmetic; the graph corrects for heat loss this is why “just take the biggest number” underestimates every calorimetry result

💡 Exam tip

⚠️ Common mix-up

That completes Tool 2. Collecting data well and processing it honestly are two halves of the same skill, and between them they account for a very large share of the internal assessment marks.

Want this explained one-to-one?

Book a free session with an experienced IB Chemistry tutor and get your trickiest topics made simple.

Book a Free Session →