IB Biology SL Topic 4 — Replicating DNA Skills Data interpretation ~10 min read

Electrophoresis & PCR: Applications

This is where the techniques earn their keep. A pattern of bands on a gel can identify a body, settle a paternity case or clear an innocent suspect. Reading those patterns is a skill, and once you know the rule it is surprisingly quick.

📘 What you need to know

What is actually being compared

Almost all of your DNA is identical to almost everyone else’s, so comparing whole genomes would be useless. Profiling targets the parts that vary most.

VNTRs stands for variable number tandem repeats. These are short stretches, roughly 20 to 50 bases long, that are repeated over and over. Non-coding regions like these are free to vary without harming the organism, so the number of repeats differs enormously between individuals.

More repeats means a longer fragment, which travels less far on a gel. So the pattern of band positions is really a read-out of how many repeats a person has at each VNTR site. Apart from identical twins, everyone’s combination is different.

If a question asks why non-coding DNA is used, the answer has two halves: it varies a lot between individuals, and because it does not code for a protein, that variation does not affect the person.

The procedure, start to finish

Making a DNA profile 1 Extract DNA from the sample 2 Amplify the DNA using PCR 3 Cut it up with restriction endonucleases 4 Separate fragments by gel electrophoresis 5 Add radioactive or fluorescent probes 6 Visualise with X-ray film or UV light 7 Compare the patterns of bands
Steps 1 to 3 prepare the DNA. Steps 4 to 7 turn it into something you can read.
Why PCR comes second, not last. Real samples are minute. Amplifying first means there is enough DNA to cut, load and stain. Try to run a gel on a single hair root without PCR and you will see nothing at all.

Reading a profile: the one rule

Everything about paternity questions comes down to a single statement.

The rule to apply Every band in the child’s profile must appear
in the mother’s profile or the father’s profile

So work through the child’s bands one at a time:

Keep going until only one candidate survives, then look for one more band as a confirmation.

A paternity DNA profile which of the four men could be the child’s father?POSSIBLE FATHERSCHILD MOTHER A B C D1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8band 1 is the largest fragment; band 8 is the smallest
Six lanes, eight band positions. Work down the child’s lane one band at a time.
WORKED EXAMPLE

Use the DNA profiles above to deduce which of the four men, A to D, is the child’s father. [4]

Step 1: band 1 the mother has band 1, so it could have come from her — it tells us nothing about the father Step 2: band 2 the mother does not have band 2, so it must be paternal; only B and D have it, so A and C are eliminated Step 3: band 3 the mother has band 3, so again it is uninformative Step 4: band 4 the mother does not have band 4, so it must be paternal; D does not have it, so D is eliminated Step 5: confirm with band 6 band 6 is absent from the mother and present in B, which supports the conclusion that B is the father always quote the band numbers you used — the reasoning is what earns the marks
Students often start by counting which man shares the most bands with the child. That can mislead you. Work through the child’s bands one at a time and eliminate, rather than looking for the best overall match.

Ancestry and paternity testing

Because VNTRs are inherited, roughly half of a child’s bands come from the mother and half from the father. A parent should therefore share about 50 % of the offspring’s bands.

The same logic extends outwards. More distant relatives share fewer bands, so profiles can be used to check whether two people are related and roughly how closely.

Watch the direction of the argument. Sharing bands is consistent with a relationship; it does not prove one. A man who has every band the child needs might still not be the father if a close relative shares the same VNTR pattern.

Forensic investigations

DNA profiling is used to identify suspects and victims.

Just as importantly, profiling can eliminate people. Someone whose DNA happens to be at the scene for innocent reasons can be cleared quickly, and past convictions have been overturned this way.

Contamination is the constant danger. A single stray skin cell from an investigator can add bands that were never in the original sample, so samples are handled with strict controls.

Nature of science: reliability

No test is ever completely certain, and that matters more than usual when evidence is going before a court.

In profiling, reliability is improved by increasing the number of VNTR markers compared. Two unrelated people might share the same pattern at one or two sites by chance, but the probability of matching at ten or more sites becomes vanishingly small.

Number of markers comparedEffect on the conclusion
FewA coincidental match is quite possible, so the evidence is weak
ManyThe chance of a false match falls sharply, so the conclusion is far more reliable

This is the general principle in a specific setting: repeating a measurement, or taking more measurements, increases the reliability of the conclusion drawn from it.

💡 Exam tip

⚠ Common mix-up

Up next: Protein Synthesis — you have seen how DNA is copied and how we read it in the lab. The next topic asks what the sequence is actually for, and how a cell turns it into a working protein.

Want this explained one-to-one?

Book a free session with an experienced IB Biology tutor and get your trickiest topics made simple.

Book a Free Session →