Most things get more dilute as they spread out. Pollutants that resist being broken down do the opposite: they get more concentrated at every step up a food chain, until the animal at the top is carrying a dose thousands of times higher than anything in the water around it. That is why eagles, not plankton, were the first casualties of DDT.
📘 What you need to know
Biomagnification is the increase in concentration of a persistent pollutant with ascending trophic level through a food chain.
Bioaccumulation is different: it is the build-up of a pollutant within one organism or within a single trophic level.
It happens because biomass decreases at higher trophic levels, so each predator eats many prey and takes in all their pollutant.
DDT is a persistent insecticide that thinned the eggshells of birds of prey, reducing hatching success.
Mercury from coal-fired power stations and gold mining is converted to methyl mercury and magnifies up marine food chains.
Macroplastics are over 5 mm; microplastics are under 5 mm and come from macroplastics broken down by wave action and UV.
Clear science communication can change public behaviour — a NOS point you may be asked about directly.
Biomagnification and bioaccumulation
These two words appear together and are constantly swapped. Keep them apart with one question: within one organism, or up a chain?
Term
What it describes
Where it happens
Bioaccumulation
The build-up of a pollutant over time
Within a single organism, or within one trophic level
Biomagnification
The increase in concentration of a pollutant
From one trophic level to the next, ascending a food chain
The reason biomagnification happens is a consequence of energy transfer. Total biomass decreases at higher trophic levels, so a predator has to eat many prey animals to survive. Each of the small organisms at the bottom consumes only a small volume of pollutant. But the organism at the top consumes many of those smaller organisms and so receives a much larger dose. Because the pollutant is persistent — it does not break down and is not excreted — that dose stays in its body.
Read the two columns together. As you go up, the blocks get narrower because there is less biomass, and the numbers get larger because the same pollutant is packed into less tissue.
DDT: the case that started it
DDT (dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) is a persistent pollutant and was a widely used insecticide in the mid-twentieth century. Sprayed on crops, it leached into waterways and eventually entered freshwater and marine ecosystems. From there it entered food chains via plankton, accumulated in the bodies of fish, and reached its highest concentrations in the birds of prey that ate those fish.
The damage was not simple poisoning. Because DDT is persistent and does not break down easily, it built up in the tissues of animals at higher trophic levels and caused thinning of eggshells. The thin shells could not withstand the weight of the parent bird during incubation, so eggs broke, fewer chicks hatched, and over time bird populations fell.
DDT has now been banned worldwide, except where it remains essential for controlling mosquitoes that transmit malaria.
The eggshell detail is worth learning properly because it explains a pattern that confuses students: the adult birds were not being killed. Their reproductive success collapsed. A population can be driven towards extinction without a single adult dying of poisoning.
Mercury
Mercury behaves the same way. It is released by activities such as coal-fired power generation and gold mining. Once in the environment, microorganisms convert it into a highly toxic form called methyl mercury, which accumulates in the bodies of fish. As larger fish eat smaller fish, the concentration of methyl mercury in their tissues increases — which is why health advice exists around eating large predatory fish such as tuna and swordfish.
Why humans appear in this topic. We eat at a high trophic level, so we sit near the top of the pyramid for any pollutant that biomagnifies. The advice given to pregnant women about tuna is applied biology from exactly this page.
Plastic pollution
Plastics damage both land and water habitats because they are non-biodegradable — they do not break down, they only break up.
Macroplastics are plastic items more than 5 mm in length: bags, bottles, food packaging, fishing nets.
Microplastics are pieces less than 5 mm. They come from macroplastics broken into smaller pieces by wave action or UV rays.
Breaking a bottle into a thousand fragments does not solve anything — it makes the plastic small enough to be eaten by organisms at the bottom of the food chain, which is where biomagnification starts.
What plastic does in marine habitats
Animals try to eat it. Turtles may attempt to eat a plastic bag that resembles a jellyfish. Albatrosses accidentally consume plastic while fishing and give it to their chicks when they regurgitate food; the chicks may later starve because their stomachs are full of plastic.
Animals become caught in it, in fishing lines and nets, leading to injury and death.
Toxins are released as the plastic breaks down, which can then lead to biomagnification in the food chain.
Very small particles are ingested by animals at the base of food chains, so the plastic itself enters the food chain.
NOS: scientists can change what people do
Public understanding of plastic pollution has shifted enormously in recent years, and the reason is effective communication of scientific findings — popular wildlife documentaries showing footage of seabirds feeding plastic to their chicks, for instance.
Clear science communication can change public behaviour in measurable ways. People have petitioned food companies and supermarkets to reduce plastic packaging, chosen to shop where less plastic is used, improved household recycling and taken their rubbish home, and switched to non-plastic items such as bamboo toothbrushes and paper straws.
If you get a NOS question on this, the argument to make is that data alone changes nothing. The eggshell data on DDT existed for years before it changed policy. What changed behaviour in both cases was the findings being communicated in a form the public could understand.
Worked examples
WORKED EXAMPLE 1
Explain why the concentration of a persistent pollutant is higher in a bird of prey than in the water it swims above. [4]
Step 1: the pollutant is taken in at the bottom
Small organisms such as plankton absorb small amounts of the pollutant from the water.
Step 2: it is not lost
The pollutant is persistent, so it is neither broken down nor excreted, and it remains in the tissues.
Step 3: the energy argument
Biomass decreases at higher trophic levels, so each predator must eat many prey organisms, taking in all of their pollutant.
Step 4: the resultThe pollutant becomes more concentrated at each trophic level, so it is highest in the top predatorthe phrase “decrease in total biomass at higher trophic levels” is the marking point students miss
WORKED EXAMPLE 2
DDT did not kill adult birds of prey directly, yet their populations fell sharply. Explain how. [3]
Step 1: what DDT did to the eggs
High tissue concentrations of DDT caused thinning of eggshells.
Step 2: the physical consequence
The thin shells could not withstand the weight of the parent bird during incubation, so the eggs broke.
Step 3: the population consequenceFewer young hatched, so reproductive success fell and population size declined over successive generationsa pollutant that reduces reproduction is just as effective at removing a population as one that kills adults
WORKED EXAMPLE 3
Distinguish between bioaccumulation and biomagnification. [2]
Bioaccumulation
The build-up of a pollutant within an individual organism, or within a single trophic level, over time.
Biomagnification
The increase in concentration of a pollutant with ascending trophic level through a food chain.
One is within an organism; the other is between trophic levelsa “distinguish” question needs both halves and an explicit contrast — defining only one scores nothing
💡 Exam tip
Use the word persistent (or non-biodegradable). It is the property that makes biomagnification possible.
Explain the mechanism through decreasing biomass at higher trophic levels, not just “it builds up”.
Give the 5 mm boundary between macro and microplastics; it is a specific, easy mark.
For DDT, name the effect precisely: eggshell thinning and reduced reproductive success.
Mention that DDT is still permitted where it is needed against malaria-carrying mosquitoes — it shows balance.
For NOS questions, give a concrete behaviour change, such as petitioning supermarkets over packaging.
⚠ Common mix-up
Swapping bioaccumulation and biomagnification. Within an organism versus up a chain.
Saying pollutants are “attracted” to top predators. Nothing is attracted — predators simply eat a lot of contaminated prey.
Claiming DDT poisoned adult birds to death. The mechanism examined is eggshell thinning.
Thinking microplastics are manufactured small. Most come from larger plastic broken up by waves and UV.
Saying plastic is biodegradable because it breaks into pieces. Breaking up is not breaking down.
Forgetting that biomagnification needs the pollutant to be persistent. A pollutant that is excreted does not magnify.
Up next: Restoring Ecosystems — the last page of this unit, and the only one about putting things back rather than taking them apart.
Want this explained one-to-one?
Book a free session with an experienced IB Biology tutor and get your trickiest topics made simple.