The greenhouse effect is not the problem. Without it, Earth would swing between extremes like Mars does and nothing would live here. The problem is that we have thickened the blanket — and worse, warming has started triggering processes that release yet more greenhouse gas. This page is about both halves of that: what we added, and what our warming has now set off on its own.
📘 What you need to know
A greenhouse gas absorbs radiation re-emitted from Earth’s surface, trapping it in the atmosphere instead of letting it escape to space.
The greenhouse effect is natural and essential — it keeps Earth warm enough for life.
Carbon dioxide and methane are the two you must know.
Since the industrial revolution, carbon dioxide levels have risen to the highest in Earth’s history, mainly from fossil fuel combustion and damage to carbon sinks.
Methane comes from ruminant guts, landfill, fossil fuel extraction, rice paddies and thawing permafrost.
Correlation is not causation — but for carbon dioxide and temperature there is additional evidence supporting a causal link.
Positive feedback makes warming self-reinforcing: lost albedo, faster decomposition, methane release, and more fires.
The greenhouse effect
Radiation from the sun passes through the atmosphere and hits Earth. The surface absorbs that energy and re-emits it at longer wavelengths — as infrared radiation, which we experience as heat. A greenhouse gas is one that absorbs this re-radiated radiation and traps it in the atmosphere, so it is not lost to space.
The name comes from the comparison with glass in a greenhouse, which lets light in and keeps heat from escaping. And the effect is genuinely necessary: without the insulating effect of greenhouse gases, Earth would experience dramatic temperature fluctuations like its neighbours. Temperatures on Mars range between about 20 °C and −153 °C.
The change of wavelength is the whole trick. Greenhouse gases are transparent to the short-wave radiation coming in, but they absorb the long-wave infrared going out.
Three terms get used interchangeably and they should not be. The greenhouse effect is a naturally occurring process happening constantly. Global warming is the rise in global temperatures caused mainly by rising greenhouse gas concentrations. Climate change is the resulting long-term change in precipitation, temperature and wind patterns. Getting these separate is worth easy marks.
Human activities and carbon dioxide
Atmospheric carbon dioxide has fluctuated throughout Earth’s history for natural reasons — volcanic eruptions and the weathering of limestone rocks, for instance. What is different now is the scale and speed. Since the industrial revolution, which began in the late 1700s when burning fossil fuels to power factories, transport and homes became commonplace, carbon dioxide levels have risen to their highest in Earth’s history.
Fossil fuel combustion is not the only route. Carbon dioxide is also released when natural stores of carbon — carbon sinks — are damaged or destroyed. Carbon sinks include trees, soils, peat bogs and the oceans, and deforestation, soil degradation, peat harvesting and ocean warming all add carbon dioxide back to the atmosphere.
Human activities and methane
Methane (CH4) is a simple hydrocarbon, present as a gas in the atmosphere and underground, and the main component of the fossil fuel natural gas. Some is produced by naturally occurring processes in certain bacteria, but levels have risen significantly over the last 150 years because of human activity.
Guts of ruminant mammals such as farmed cattle. Intensive farming of these animals has greatly increased their contribution.
Landfill sites, where organic matter such as food waste decomposes.
Extraction of fossil fuels from underground.
Rice paddy fields, where anaerobic bacteria in the waterlogged soil release methane.
Permafrost — ground that stays frozen all year round. Warming of the poles releases methane from this natural store, which is a consequence of global warming rather than a direct human activity.
Check the axes carefully in questions like this. The left axis is carbon dioxide in ppm and the right is methane in ppb — a thousand times smaller a unit, which is why the two lines can sit on top of each other.
NOS: correlation and causation
Correlation analysis means measuring two variables and assessing the relationship between them to look for an association.
Positive correlation — as one variable increases, the other also increases.
Negative correlation — as one variable increases, the other decreases.
The dashed line is a trend line, not a measurement. Its job is to make the direction obvious — nothing more.
In climate change research, evidence from Antarctic ice cores shows a positive correlation between global temperatures and atmospheric carbon dioxide over hundreds of thousands of years. That is powerful, but on its own it is still only an association.
A correlation shows evidence of association, but in itself it does not provide evidence of causation. Two problems remain:
It is not possible to say which variable influenced which.
An unknown third variable might be responsible for both.
In this particular case, though, there is additional evidence supporting a causal link — we understand the physical mechanism by which greenhouse gases trap re-emitted radiation. The correlation plus that mechanism plus laboratory measurements together build a strong case, which no single piece of evidence could do alone.
How to phrase this in an exam. “The data show a positive correlation between carbon dioxide concentration and global temperature. Correlation alone does not prove causation, but additional evidence about how greenhouse gases absorb re-emitted radiation supports a causal link.” That sentence pattern will earn marks in almost any NOS question of this type.
Positive feedback: warming that causes more warming
Positive feedback is any mechanism that leads to additional and increased change away from equilibrium. The output of a process feeds back into the system in a way that moves it further from its average state. Positive feedback is therefore destabilising: it amplifies deviation and drives systems towards a tipping point where the state suddenly shifts to a new equilibrium.
Global warming has a positive feedback effect on the Earth and its atmosphere. In plain terms: global warming causes more global warming. Four mechanisms matter.
1. Loss of reflective snow and ice
The extent to which a surface reflects light is its albedo. Light-coloured surfaces such as snow and ice have a high albedo; dark surfaces such as rock, soil and open ocean have a low albedo. As polar ice caps melt, Earth’s overall albedo decreases, more of the sun’s energy is absorbed rather than reflected, and warming increases — which melts more ice.
You met negative feedback loops in the homeostasis pages. This is the same shape of diagram with the opposite consequence: instead of returning to a set point, the system runs away from it.
2. Accelerating decomposition
Decomposition is carried out by living organisms such as bacteria and fungi, which break down dead matter and waste in a series of enzyme-controlled reactions. Those reactions run faster at higher temperatures, so as warming increases, rates of decomposition increase — and the respiration of decay microorganisms releases carbon dioxide.
Two stores matter most here:
Peat bogs function as carbon sinks when they are stable. Increased decomposition releases huge volumes of carbon dioxide from them.
Permafrost is a huge carbon sink precisely because it contains organic material that cannot decompose at low temperatures — decay organisms are inactive when it is cold. Warm it and that material starts decomposing.
3. Release of methane
Melting permafrost also releases methane, a potent greenhouse gas, because of the activity of methanogenic microorganisms in the frozen soil, which increases as the permafrost melts. These are species of archaea that produce methane as part of their metabolism.
4. Increasing drought and forest fires
Warming increases the frequency of extreme weather events, so droughts occur more often. Dry vegetation catches fire easily, so wildfires become more likely. Combustion of plant material releases carbon dioxide, and the resulting reduction in the number of photosynthesising plants means less carbon dioxide is removed from the atmosphere afterwards. That is a double blow: more released, less taken back.
Worked examples
WORKED EXAMPLE 1
Explain how greenhouse gases in the atmosphere raise the temperature of Earth’s surface. [4]
Step 1: radiation arrives
Short-wavelength radiation from the sun passes through the atmosphere and is absorbed by Earth’s surface.
Step 2: the wavelength changes
The surface re-emits the energy at longer wavelengths, as infrared radiation.
Step 3: what the gases do
Greenhouse gases absorb this re-emitted radiation and re-emit it in all directions, so some is trapped in the atmosphere rather than being lost to space.
Step 4: the outcomeLess heat escapes, so the surface becomes warmerthe marks hinge on “re-emitted at longer wavelengths” — without it, the mechanism does not work
WORKED EXAMPLE 2
Ice core data show a positive correlation between atmospheric carbon dioxide and temperature over 800,000 years. Evaluate the claim that this proves carbon dioxide causes global warming. [3]
Step 1: what the data do show
A positive correlation: as carbon dioxide concentration rises, temperature also rises.
Step 2: the limitationCorrelation does not prove causation — the data cannot show which variable influenced the other, and a third variable could be affecting both.
Step 3: the balanced judgementThe claim is not proved by correlation alone, but additional evidence about how greenhouse gases absorb re-emitted radiation supports a causal link“evaluate” means giving both the limitation and the counterweight, not just rejecting the claim
WORKED EXAMPLE 3
Explain why melting permafrost is described as a positive feedback mechanism. [4]
Step 1: what starts it
Global warming raises temperatures at the poles, so permafrost begins to thaw.
Step 2: what is released
Organic material that could not decompose while frozen is now broken down by decay organisms, whose respiration releases carbon dioxide. Methanogenic archaea also become more active, releasing methane.
Step 3: close the loop
Both gases are greenhouse gases, so more heat is trapped and global temperature rises further, thawing yet more permafrost.
Step 4: name itThe output of the process amplifies the original change, so it is positive feedbackalways finish a feedback answer by returning to the starting variable — that is what makes it a loop
💡 Exam tip
Say radiation is re-emitted at longer wavelengths. Vague answers about “heat being trapped” score poorly.
Keep greenhouse effect, global warming and climate change distinct, and use the right one.
Name both gases and give specific human sources for each.
For correlation questions, state the direction, then the limitation, then the additional evidence.
For feedback questions, always close the loop back to the starting variable.
Use the word albedo, and define it as the extent to which a surface reflects light.
⚠ Common mix-up
Saying the greenhouse effect is bad. It is natural and necessary; the problem is its enhancement.
Saying greenhouse gases block sunlight coming in. They are transparent to incoming short-wave radiation.
Confusing positive feedback with a positive outcome. Positive means amplifying, and here that is destabilising.
Treating correlation as proof. Say what extra evidence would be needed.
Forgetting that fires cut carbon uptake too, not just release carbon.
Mixing up ppm and ppb when reading a dual-axis graph.
Saying permafrost releases only methane. It releases carbon dioxide as well, through decomposition.
Up next: Impacts of Climate Change — what all of this actually does to boreal forests, polar species, ocean currents, species ranges and coral reefs.
Want this explained one-to-one?
Book a free session with an experienced IB Biology tutor and get your trickiest topics made simple.