IB Biology HL Cell Structure & Microscopy Paper 1 & 2 ~12 min read

Microscopes

Your eye can just about separate two dots a tenth of a millimetre apart. A bacterium is a hundred times smaller than that. Everything biologists know about the inside of a cell comes from instruments built to get past that limit — and from being able to work out how big the thing really is.

📚 What you need to know

Magnification is not resolution

These two get mixed up constantly, so pin them down now.

Two different things Magnification = how many times larger the image is
Resolution = the smallest distance between two points that can still be seen as separate

Think about zooming into a photo on your phone. Keep zooming and the picture gets bigger, but past a certain point it stops getting clearer — you just get bigger blur. You increased the magnification and gained nothing, because you ran out of resolution.

Microscopes work the same way. Magnifying beyond the resolution limit is called empty magnification: a larger image with no extra detail in it. This is why an electron microscope is genuinely better rather than just stronger. It has a much smaller resolution limit, so magnifying more actually reveals more.

The reason is the wavelength. A light microscope uses visible light, and you cannot resolve two points much closer together than about half a wavelength of what you are using to look at them. Electrons behave as waves with a far shorter wavelength, so the limit drops by a factor of several hundred.
What each instrument can separate Each step along the scale is ten times bigger than the one before it.atom 0.1 nm ribosome 20 nm bacterium 1 µm human egg 100 µmDNA helix 2 nm virus 100 nm animal cell 20 µm 0.1 nm 1 nm 10 nm 100 nm 1 µm 10 µm 100 µm 1 mm electron microscope, down to 0.5 nm light microscope, down to 200 nm naked eyeAnything to the left of a bar is too small for that instrument to show as separate points.
The bars start at each resolution limit. Notice the light microscope stops well short of a ribosome — that is why organelles were only described properly once electron microscopes arrived.

Light and electron microscopes

Each type buys you something and costs you something. Exam questions almost always want a trade-off, not a winner.

FeatureLight microscopeElectron microscope
What passes through the sampleVisible lightA beam of electrons
ResolutionAbout 200 nmAbout 0.5 nm
Useful magnificationUp to roughly ×2000Hundreds of thousands of times
Living specimensYes — you can watch cells moveNo — the sample sits in a vacuum
ColourNatural colour, or stainedBlack and white; colour is added afterwards
Preparing the sampleQuick and simpleSlow, skilled, and can create artefacts
Cost and sizeCheap, sits on a benchVery expensive, fills a room

Two kinds of electron microscope

🧠

TEM or SEM?

T for through and thin slices, so you see inside. S for surface and scanning, so you see the outside in 3D.

Getting more out of a sample

A raw cell is mostly transparent and looks like grey mush. Several techniques fix that, and each one is on the syllabus for a reason.

TechniqueWhat is doneWhat it lets you see
StainingA dye is added that binds to particular structuresIncreases contrast, so structures such as nuclei stand out from the background
Freeze fractureThe sample is frozen very fast, then cracked open. The crack runs along the weak middle of membranesThe inside face of a membrane, including the proteins embedded in it
Cryogenic electron microscopyThe sample is frozen so quickly that ice crystals never form, then imaged with electronsMolecules in close to their natural shape, without the chemicals normally needed to prepare a sample
Fluorescent stainsA dye that glows under a certain wavelength of light is attached to a moleculeWhere that molecule sits inside a living cell
ImmunofluorescenceA fluorescent marker is attached to an antibody that binds one specific proteinThe exact location of one named protein, because antibodies are so specific
Why immunofluorescence is such a big deal. Ordinary stains colour a whole type of structure. An antibody binds to one protein and nothing else, so attaching a glowing tag to it lets you follow that single protein around a living cell. That is the difference between seeing that a cell has a skeleton and seeing which fibre is which.

Working out magnification

This is the calculation that appears every year. It is one equation with two rearrangements.

Learn this one magnification = image size ÷ actual size
actual size = image size ÷ magnification
image size = actual size × magnification
Magnification is just a ratio How many times bigger the picture is than the real thing. It has no units. magnification = image ÷ actual 45 mm ÷ 0.03 mm = ×1500the real cell 0.03 mm, which is 30 µmthe image you see 45 mm across on the pageBoth sizes must be in the same unit before you divide Convert first, divide second. Almost every lost mark here is a unit mistake.
Magnification never has a unit, because the two lengths cancel. If your answer comes out in mm or µm, you have divided the wrong way round.

Units, and how to move between them

UnitSymbolIn metresTypical use
millimetremm1 × 10–3 mWhat you measure on the page with a ruler
micrometreµm1 × 10–6 mCells and most organelles
nanometrenm1 × 10–9 mMembranes, ribosomes, molecules

Two conversions do everything: 1 mm = 1000 µm and 1 µm = 1000 nm. Going to a smaller unit means multiplying by 1000; going to a bigger one means dividing by 1000.

Measure in millimetres, then convert to micrometres straight away by multiplying by 1000. Doing the conversion first, before any dividing, removes almost all the mistakes I see in this calculation.

Scale bars

A micrograph in a book might be printed at any size, so a stated magnification would be useless. Instead the image carries a scale bar: a short line labelled with the real length it stands for.

Turning a scale bar into a magnification Measure the bar with a ruler, then compare it with the length it is labelled with. 60 mm wide on the page 10 µm the bar measures 20 mm20 mm = 20 000 µm 20 000 µm ÷ 10 µm = ×2000Once you have the magnification, any other length on the image can be converted too.
With a magnification of ×2000, the cell above is 60 mm ÷ 2000 = 0.03 mm across in real life, which is 30 µm.

Worked examples

WE 1

Calculate a magnification

A cell in a micrograph measures 45 mm across. The cell is actually 30 µm across. Calculate the magnification. (2 marks)

Step 1: same units first 45 mm × 1000 = 45 000 µm Step 2: divide image by actual 45 000 µm ÷ 30 µm = 1500 Step 3: write it properly Magnification has no unit, so it is written with a multiplication sign in front. ×1500 converting to µm first is safer than converting the cell size to mm
WE 2

Calculate an actual size

An organelle measures 8 mm on an image taken at a magnification of ×400. Calculate its actual size in µm. (2 marks)

Step 1: rearrange actual size = image size ÷ magnification Step 2: substitute 8 mm ÷ 400 = 0.02 mm Step 3: convert to the unit asked for 0.02 mm × 1000 = 20 µm 20 µm check the question for the unit it wants — a right number in the wrong unit loses the mark
WE 3

Use a scale bar

A micrograph carries a scale bar labelled 10 µm, which measures 20 mm when you put a ruler on it. A cell in the same image measures 60 mm across. Calculate the magnification and the real width of the cell. (3 marks)

Step 1: magnification from the bar 20 mm = 20 000 µm, so magnification = 20 000 µm ÷ 10 µm = ×2000 Step 2: real width of the cell 60 mm ÷ 2000 = 0.03 mm Step 3: convert 0.03 mm × 1000 = 30 µm ×2000, and the cell is 30 µm wide the scale bar and the cell must be measured on the same copy of the image

💡 Exam tips

⚠ Common mistakes

Up next: General Cell Structure — what all those instruments actually reveal, and the parts every cell shares before we split them into prokaryotes and eukaryotes.

Want this explained one-to-one?

Book a free session with an experienced IB Biology tutor and get your trickiest topics made simple.

Book a Free Session →