IB Biology HLNatural SelectionPaper 1 & 2~12 min read
Types of Natural Selection
Selection always works the same way, but the shape of the result depends on which individuals are being removed. Take out one extreme and the population slides. Take out both extremes and it tightens. Take out the middle and it splits.
📚 What you need to know
There are three main types: directional, stabilising and disruptive.
Directional selection shifts a population towards one extreme and happens when environmental conditions change.
Stabilising selection favours the average individual, happens when conditions are stable, and is the most common form.
Stabilising selection decreases diversity and works mostly on polygenic traits.
Disruptive selection acts against the average, is the rarest form, and can lead to speciation.
Disruptive selection is also called diversifying selection.
A disadvantageous allele does not have to be fatal — it only has to stop successful reproduction.
You must be able to recognise all three from the shape of a distribution curve.
Directional selection
In directional selection the population changes towards one extreme of a range of variation, because that extreme becomes better adapted. This tends to happen when environmental conditions change.
The dashed curve is the population before the environment changed. The solid curve is the same population a number of generations later.
The frost example
Suppose average temperatures fall, so plants now face frosts — spells where the air temperature drops below 0°C.
If no allele exists in the population that gives any frost resistance, the species will become extinct in that habitat if the cold lasts more than one generation.
If an allele does exist that gives some frost protection, those plants survive the frost and reproduce successfully.
Such an allele might code for a protein that lowers the freezing point of the cell contents by a few degrees and prevents damaging ice crystals from forming.
The plants that carry it have a selective advantage, so the allele spreads and the population shifts towards frost tolerance.
A subtle but examinable point. A disadvantageous allele does not have to be fatal. It only has to prevent the individual from reproducing successfully, because from an evolutionary point of view that is the same thing — the allele disappears from the gene pool when its carrier dies without offspring.
Because a strong new pressure can act on every individual at once, a species can change its genome abruptly by directional selection. It is the fastest of the three types.
A second good example: as oceans warm, fish metabolism speeds up and their oxygen demand rises, while warmer water actually holds less oxygen. Larger fish have greater metabolic needs, so they feel this most, and selection pushes populations towards smaller body sizes. Same graph, different story.
Stabilising selection
Stabilising selection selects in favour of the average individual. It occurs when environmental conditions are stable and do not change, so the phenotype that already works keeps on working. This is the most common form of natural selection, which makes sense — most of the time, most environments are not changing dramatically.
The peak looks taller only because the same number of individuals is now squeezed into a narrower range of phenotypes.
Selection favours individuals whose combination of alleles gives the most advantageous characteristic for the conditions.
Coat colour in mice is one example. The colour settles on whichever shade gives the best camouflage against the local surroundings, such as brown fur on a forest floor.
Human birth mass is the classic example. Birth mass shows a normal distribution clustered around a mean, and both very low and very high birth masses cause problems for an infant’s survival.
Stabilising selection discards extreme phenotypes and favours the majority of the population that is already well adapted.
It therefore decreases diversity within a population, and works mostly on polygenic traits — ones controlled by several genes, which is why they give a smooth bell-shaped curve.
Disruptive selection
Disruptive selection selects against the average individual. It is the rarest of the three forms. Like directional selection, it happens when habitats or resources undergo a change — but here two different extremes each turn out to work, and the middle option works worst.
The dip in the middle is the whole diagram. If you can see a dip where the old mean was, the answer is disruptive selection.
Because it pulls a population apart, disruptive selection can lead to the formation of an entirely new species, a process called speciation. For that reason it is sometimes called diversifying selection.
Darwin’s finches
The finches of the Galápagos Islands are one of the best known examples. Fifteen different species evolved from a single common ancestor, and multiple beak types adapted to different food sources over time.
On the island of Santa Cruz, ground finches eat mostly seeds and some arthropods, tree finches eat more fruits and arthropods, vegetarian finches feed on leaves and fruit, and warblers take mainly arthropods.
When food is abundant their diets overlap and beak shape hardly matters. When food is scarce, each specialisation lets that species compete for one particular food better than the others can — which is how each species ends up occupying its own niche.
Feature
Directional
Stabilising
Disruptive
Who is favoured
One extreme
The average
Both extremes
Who is selected against
The other extreme
Both extremes
The average
Conditions
Environment changing
Environment stable
Habitat or resources change
Effect on the mean
Moves towards one extreme
Stays the same
Splits into two
Effect on diversity
Roughly unchanged
Decreases
Increases
How common
Common when conditions shift
The most common form
The rarest form
Classic example
Frost resistance in plants
Human birth mass
Beak size in finches
🧠
Reading the graph in three seconds
Peak has moved sideways, same shape → directional. Peak in the same place but narrower → stabilising. Two peaks with a dip in the middle → disruptive.
Worked examples
WE 1
Identify the type of selection
Data on human infants shows that mortality is highest at very low and very high birth masses, and lowest around the mean. Identify the type of natural selection acting and justify your answer. (2 marks)
IdentificationStabilising selection.Justification
Both extremes of the range are selected against and the average individual is favoured, so the mean stays the same while the spread of the distribution narrows.
Both tails removed, mean unchanged: stabilising“justify” means quote the evidence from the data, not just describe the type in general
WE 2
Directional selection in a plant population
Average winter temperatures in a region fall over 30 years. Explain how directional selection could change a plant population, and state what would happen if no suitable allele existed. (4 marks)
Point 1: variation exists
Some plants carry an allele giving a degree of frost protection, perhaps coding for a protein that lowers the freezing point of the cell contents.
Point 2: differential survival
Those plants survive the frost and go on to reproduce successfully, so they have a selective advantage.
Point 3: shift in the population
The allele increases in frequency each generation, so the mean of the population moves towards the frost-tolerant extreme.
Point 4: if no allele exists
If no allele for frost resistance is present, the species becomes extinct in that habitat if the cold conditions last more than one generation.
Selection can only use alleles that are already in the gene poolthe extinction point is worth a mark on its own and is often left out
WE 3
From disruptive selection to speciation
A population of birds lives on an island where only very small seeds and very large seeds are available. Explain how this could eventually lead to two species. (3 marks)
Point 1: the middle is worst off
Birds with medium beaks handle neither seed type well, so they are selected against, while both extremes feed successfully.
Point 2: two groups form
Small-beaked and large-beaked birds each survive and reproduce, so the distribution develops two peaks and diversity increases.
Point 3: isolation
If the two groups feed in different places and stop interbreeding, their gene pools separate and they accumulate more differences until they can no longer produce fertile offspring.
Disruptive selection, then reproductive isolation, then speciationsay each group occupies its own niche — it is the phrase examiners look for
💡 Exam tips
Learn the three graph shapes properly. A quick sketch in the margin often unlocks the question.
Say which individuals are selected against, not only which are favoured. It is usually the clearer mark.
Link each type to its conditions: changing environment for directional, stable for stabilising, changed habitat or resources for disruptive.
Remember stabilising is the most common and disruptive is the rarest.
Use the word polygenic when explaining why these traits form a smooth normal distribution.
Only disruptive selection is routinely linked to speciation.
⚠ Common mistakes
Calling any change directional. Check whether the mean has moved, narrowed or split before naming the type.
Saying stabilising selection stops evolution. It is still selection — it actively removes extremes every generation.
Thinking a taller peak means more individuals. The population size can be identical; the curve is just narrower.
Assuming a disadvantageous allele must kill. It only has to prevent successful reproduction.
Confusing disruptive with directional. Disruptive favours both extremes, not one.
Forgetting extinction as an outcome. If the useful allele is not in the gene pool, the population cannot adapt.
Up next: Hardy-Weinberg Principle. You can now describe how allele frequencies change. The next page gives you the equations that predict what those frequencies should be if nothing is changing them at all.
Want this explained one-to-one?
Book a free session with an experienced IB Biology tutor and get your trickiest topics made simple.