IB Biology HL Practical Skills Paper 1B & IA ~14 min read

Measuring Variables

Every practical comes down to the same question: is this number trustworthy? That depends on picking the right instrument for the job, knowing how finely it can read, and being honest about how far out it might be.

📚 What you need to know

Accurate is not the same as precise

These two words get used interchangeably in conversation, and separating them is one of the quickest ways to sound like you know what you are doing in an evaluation.

The distinction Accuracy = how close a reading is to the true value  •  Precision = how close repeated readings are to each other
Four sets of results, four verdicts Accurate and precise true value, tightly grouped Precise, not accurate tight group, off target Accurate, not precise mean is right, but scattered Neither scattered and off targetRepeating a measurement reveals precision; only a known true value reveals accuracy
The second target is the dangerous one. Consistent results feel reliable, so a systematic error — an unzeroed balance, a mis-calibrated probe — can hide behind them for a whole investigation.

Measuring mass

Taring is worth understanding rather than just doing. If you forget, every single reading is wrong by the same amount — the mass of the weighing boat. That is a systematic error, and repeating the measurement will not reveal it.

Measuring the volume of liquids

Common units are cm3, dm3, ml and l. A millilitre is the same as a cm3, so labels using either can be read the same way.

Choosing the right piece of glassware burette accurate variable volume measuring cylinder quick, approximate volumetric pipette one accurate fixed volume gas syringe collects a gasThe narrower the column of liquid, the more finely the scale can be divided
This is why a burette is more accurate than a measuring cylinder of the same capacity. Its bore is narrow, so the same volume occupies a much longer length of tube and the scale can be split more finely.

The three you need to distinguish

Reading a scale without fooling yourself eye above the level reading comes out too low eye level with the meniscus this is the correct reading eye below the level reading comes out too highread the BOTTOM of the curved surfaceLooking from an angle is called a parallax error, and it is entirely avoidable
Water curves upwards at the edges because it is attracted to glass more strongly than to itself. The convention is always to read the lowest point of that curve, at eye level.

Measuring the volume of gases

In biology the classic case is oxygen from a catalase or photosynthesis practical. Oxygen has low solubility in water, so collecting it over water is fine. Carbon dioxide is far more soluble, so a gas syringe is the safer choice.

Measuring time

This is a useful evaluation point. If a reaction finishes in 3 s, a reaction time of about 0.2 s is roughly 7 % of the measurement. If it takes 300 s, the same 0.2 s is negligible. The fix is to slow the reaction down so the time being measured is longer.

Measuring temperature

Measuring length

VariableInstrumentTypical precisionMain source of error
MassDigital balance0.01 gForgetting to tare, draughts
Volume of liquidBurette or volumetric pipette0.05 cm3Parallax, reading the wrong part of the meniscus
Volume of gasGas syringe1 cm3Gas escaping before the bung is in, or dissolving
TimeStopwatch0.01 sHuman reaction time
TemperatureDigital probe0.1 °CProbe not fully immersed, water bath not at equilibrium
LengthRuler1 mmParallax, a worn or bent zero end
Precision is a property of the instrument. Accuracy is a property of the reading you take with it. A digital probe reading to 0.1 °C is precise, but if you leave it dangling in the air above the water it will still be badly inaccurate.

Making counts

Counting cells

Counting the cells in a known volume of a culture lets you work out the concentration of the whole sample.

Counting organisms

A great deal of ecology involves counting organisms, and it is far harder than counting cells:

Recording what you see

Biological drawings

To record observations made under the microscope, or from a photomicrograph, a labelled biological drawing is made. These are line pictures showing the specific features that were actually observed, and they follow a set of conventions: clean continuous lines, no shading or sketchy strokes, label lines that do not cross, and a stated magnification.

Qualitative observations

Not all data is numerical. Classifying organisms is a good example of a qualitative observation — data classified by attributes such as sex, colour of fur or number of limbs. The attribute being observed cannot be measured on a scale, so it counts as qualitative data.

🧠

Quantitative or qualitative?

Quantitative has “quantity” in it — it has a number and a unit. Qualitative has “quality” — it describes what something is like. Counting 14 limpets is quantitative; recording that they are on the shaded side of the rock is qualitative.

Worked examples

WE 1

Justifying a choice of apparatus

A student needs to transfer exactly 25 cm3 of enzyme solution into each of six test tubes. They could use a 50 cm3 measuring cylinder (±0.5 cm3) or a 25 cm3 volumetric pipette (±0.06 cm3). Calculate the percentage uncertainty of each and recommend one. (4 marks)

Step 1: measuring cylinder (0.5 ÷ 25) × 100 = 2.0 % Step 2: volumetric pipette (0.06 ÷ 25) × 100 = 0.24 % Step 3: recommend, with a reason The volumetric pipette, because its percentage uncertainty is roughly eight times smaller, and it is designed to deliver one fixed volume accurately — which is exactly what is needed here. Step 4: the extra point Using the same pipette for all six tubes also makes the volumes consistent, which matters because volume is a controlled variable. 0.24 % versus 2.0 % — use the pipette a burette would be the wrong answer here: it is for variable volumes, and this volume never changes.
WE 2

Accuracy and precision from data

A solution is known to contain 25.0 g dm−3 of glucose. Student A measures 24.9, 25.1 and 25.0 g dm−3. Student B measures 23.0, 23.1 and 23.0 g dm−3. Comment on the accuracy and precision of each set, and suggest a cause of any problem. (4 marks)

Student A Readings are close to each other (range 0.2) and close to the true value, so they are both precise and accurate. Student B Readings are equally close to each other (range 0.1), so they are precise, but they are consistently about 2.0 g dm−3 below the true value, so they are not accurate. Diagnosing student B A consistent offset in the same direction indicates a systematic error — for example a balance that was not tared, or a colorimeter that was not zeroed with a blank. Why repeats will not help Taking more readings would reduce random error, but would not reveal or fix a systematic one. Same spread, very different quality of data the giveaway for systematic error is that every reading is out by roughly the same amount, in the same direction.
WE 3

Scaling up a cell count

A student counts 96 yeast cells in a haemocytometer grid with a volume of 0.10 mm3. Calculate the number of cells per cm3 of the culture. (3 marks)

Step 1: cells per mm3 96 ÷ 0.10 = 960 cells per mm3 Step 2: convert the unit of volume 1 cm3 = 1000 mm3 Step 3: scale up 960 × 1000 = 9.6 × 105 cells per cm3 A point worth adding If the culture had been diluted before counting, the answer must be multiplied by the dilution factor. 9.6 × 105 cells cm−3 the volume conversion is where nearly all the marks are lost. 1 cm3 is 1000 mm3, not 100.

💡 Exam tips

⚠ Common mistakes

Up next: Applying Lab Techniques. The last page in this skill set runs through the nine techniques the course expects you to be able to describe the purpose of and explain how to carry out — from chromatography and colorimetry to graticules, sampling and cladograms.

Want this explained one-to-one?

Book a free session with an experienced IB Biology tutor and get your trickiest topics made simple.

Book a Free Session →