IB Economics SL Topic 3 — Fiscal Policy Paper 1 & 2 Core idea ~12 min read

How Fiscal Policy Works

Monetary policy makes borrowing cheaper and hopes somebody spends. Fiscal policy skips the hoping: the government spends the money itself, or leaves more of it in your pocket by cutting tax. That directness is its great strength — and the reason it is so hard to reverse.

📚 What you need to know

The budget: revenue, spending and the gap between

Every year the government sets out what it expects to raise and what it plans to spend. The difference between those two numbers is the budget balance, and it is the single figure that shapes the whole fiscal debate.

A budget deficit in one picture $420bn $465bn Revenue Spending Deficit $45bn Financed by borrowing, which is added to the public debt
A deficit is a flow measured over one year. The public debt is the stock built up from every past deficit — the same stock-and-flow distinction as income and wealth.
WORKED EXAMPLE

Revenue is $420bn, spending is $465bn, GDP is $1,500bn and public debt at the start of the year was $900bn. Calculate the deficit as a share of GDP and the new debt-to-GDP ratio. [4]

Step 1: the budget balance 465 − 420 = $45bn deficit Step 2: as a share of GDP (45 ÷ 1,500) × 100 = 3.00% Step 3: the new debt stock 900 + 45 = $945bn Step 4: the new ratio (945 ÷ 1,500) × 100 = 63.00%, up from 60.00% Deficit 3.00% of GDP; debt rises to 63.00% of GDP Note that the ratio would have fallen if GDP had grown faster than the debt. Growth is a way of reducing debt without cutting spending at all.

Where the money comes from and goes

Side of the budgetCategoryExamples
RevenueDirect taxesIncome tax, corporation tax, capital gains tax, inheritance tax
RevenueIndirect taxesVAT and excise duties on fuel, alcohol and tobacco
RevenueOther sourcesCharges by state-owned firms, and one-off receipts from privatisation
SpendingCurrent expenditureDay-to-day running costs: public sector salaries, medicines, fuel for buses
SpendingCapital expenditureInvestment in infrastructure: railways, hospitals, schools, energy networks
SpendingTransfer paymentsBenefits, pensions and subsidies, where no good or service is received in return
Transfer payments are not government spending in the AD formula. No output is produced, so nothing is added to G. They still affect AD, but indirectly, by raising household income and therefore consumption. Getting this right separates a Level 3 answer from a Level 2 one.

Expansionary fiscal policy

When output is below full employment, the government can close the gap by spending more or taxing less. Higher G raises AD directly. Lower income tax raises disposable income and therefore consumption; lower corporation tax raises retained profit and therefore investment.

Expansionary fiscal policy closes a recessionary gap Average price level Real GDP LRAS SRAS AD₁ AD₂ AP₁ AP₂ Y₁ Yfe recessionary gap higher G
Contractionary fiscal policy is the mirror image: AD shifts left, the price level falls and output drops back from an inflationary gap.
PolicyInstrumentChain of effects
Expansionary Cut income tax Disposable income rises → consumption rises → AD shifts right → output and employment rise, prices rise
Expansionary Raise capital spending Government orders goods and hires firms → G rises directly → AD shifts right → and capacity rises later too
Contractionary Raise income tax Disposable income falls → consumption falls → AD shifts left → inflation eases, unemployment may rise
Contractionary Freeze public sector pay Real wages fall → consumption falls → AD shifts left → price pressure eases, growth slows

The multiplier: why $6bn becomes $12bn

Government spending does not stop when the government has spent it. The builders paid to construct a school spend their wages in local shops; the shopkeepers spend some of that too. Each round is smaller, because some money leaks out into saving, taxation and imports, but the total effect is bigger than the original injection.

The multiplier k = 1 ÷ MPW   where MPW = MPS + MPT + MPM
Change in AD = injection × k
One injection, many rounds of spending Extra spending in each round ($bn) 6.0 3.0 1.5 0.75 0.38 0.19 1 2 3 4 5 6 Total: $12bn Half of every extra pound leaks away, so each round is half the last.
The bigger the leakages, the smaller the multiplier. An economy that imports heavily or taxes heavily gets less bang for each fiscal buck.
WORKED EXAMPLE

MPS = 0.10, MPT = 0.25 and MPM = 0.15. The government raises capital spending by $6bn. Calculate the multiplier and the total change in AD. [3]

Step 1: add the leakages MPW = 0.10 + 0.25 + 0.15 = 0.50 Step 2: find the multiplier k = 1 ÷ 0.50 = 2 Step 3: apply it to the injection Change in AD = $6bn × 2 = $12bn Multiplier 2; AD rises by $12bn Check it against MPC: if half of every extra pound leaks out, MPC = 0.5, and 1 ÷ (1 − 0.5) also gives 2.
The multiplier works in both directions. A $6bn spending cut with the same leakages reduces AD by $12bn. That is why austerity in a weak economy can shrink output by far more than the amount saved.

What fiscal policy is aiming at

The best kind of government spending is often said to be spending that raises AD today and LRAS tomorrow. Building a rail link creates jobs and orders immediately, then permanently lowers transport costs. Use this example whenever you need to link fiscal and supply-side policy.

💡 Exam tip

⚠ Common mix-up

Up next: Evaluating Fiscal Policy — automatic stabilisers, crowding out, and why the politics is often the binding constraint.

Want this explained one-to-one?

Book a free session with an experienced IB Economics tutor and get your trickiest topics made simple.

Book a Free Session →