IB Business Management HL Unit 1.4 — Stakeholders Paper 1 & 2 Core idea ~10 min read

Who a Business Has to Answer To

No business gets to make decisions in private. Every choice it makes lands on somebody — a worker, a supplier, a neighbour, a tax office. Those people are its stakeholders, and once you can name them and say what each one wants, half the evaluation marks in Paper 1 and Paper 2 open up.

📘 What you need to know

What a stakeholder actually is

The test is simple: if the business closed tomorrow, would this person or group notice? If yes, they are a stakeholder. That covers the obvious ones like staff and customers, but it also covers the newsagent next door who relies on your workers buying lunch, and the council that collects your business rates.

Notice that the definition does not require anyone to own anything. You do not need a share certificate to be a stakeholder. You just need to be affected.

Two rings of stakeholders Inside the business, and outside it looking in INTERNAL inside the organisation Employees Managers and directors Shareholders / owners they run the firm or own it EXTERNAL outside, but affected Customers Suppliers Government Local community Pressure groups and banks The line is about membership, not distance A supplier may sit next door and still be external; a shareholder may live abroad and still be internal
Internal stakeholders are part of the organisation itself. External ones deal with it from outside. Get this split right and the rest of the topic falls into place.
Students often put suppliers in the internal column because the supplier is “involved” with the business. Involvement is not membership. A supplier has its own owners, its own staff and its own accounts. It is a separate business trading with yours, so it is external.

The internal stakeholders

These three groups are inside the firm, which means their fortunes are tied directly to how it performs.

GroupWhat they wantWhat makes them unhappy
EmployeesFair pay, job security, safe conditions, training, respectRedundancies, wage freezes, unpredictable shifts
Managers and directorsBudgets to hit targets, authority, bonuses, career progressCost cuts to their department, interference from above
Shareholders and ownersDividends, a rising share price, sound long-term decisionsFalling profit, risky spending, money kept back from them
Watch the split inside the firm: managers and shareholders are both internal, yet they frequently disagree. Managers are judged on this year’s results, shareholders on the value of the business over many years. That gap is a ready-made evaluation point.

The external stakeholders

External groups have no vote inside the business, but several of them can stop it functioning altogether.

GroupWhat they wantHow they apply pressure
CustomersGood quality, fair price, honesty, reliable supplyStop buying, complain publicly, switch to a rival
SuppliersRegular orders, prompt payment, a long relationshipRaise prices, demand cash up front, refuse to deliver
GovernmentTax paid, laws obeyed, employment createdFines, inspections, new regulation, court action
Local communityJobs, low pollution, little traffic and noiseObject to planning permission, campaign locally
Banks and creditorsRepayment on time, low risk of defaultRefuse to lend, raise interest, call in the loan
Pressure groupsA change in behaviour on one specific issueMedia campaigns, boycotts, protests at premises
Competitors are a slightly odd case. They are affected by what your firm does, so most textbooks list them as external stakeholders, but they want you to do worse, not better. If you mention them, say that clearly — it shows you understand the definition rather than reciting a list.

Not everyone who cares has power

A firm cannot give every group everything it wants, so it has to prioritise. The useful question is not “who cares about this decision?” but “who cares and can do something about it?” A single unhappy customer has interest but almost no power. A bank that is owed two million has enormous power and will use it.

Who do you actually have to please? Power on one axis, interest on the other KEEP THEM SATISFIED banks, government high power, low interest MANAGE CLOSELY owners, big customers high power, high interest JUST MONITOR the general public low power, low interest KEEP THEM INFORMED staff, local community low power, high interest HIGH POWER LOW POWER LOW INTEREST HIGH INTEREST The top-right box is the one that decides most cases Groups can move between boxes: an ignored community becomes powerful the moment it organises
The IB does not ask you to name this grid, but it does reward answers that say which stakeholder matters most and why. This is the thinking behind that judgement.

🧩 How to use stakeholders in an evaluation question

  1. Name two or three groups only, taken from the case study rather than from memory.
  2. Say what each one actually wants in this specific situation, not in general.
  3. Rank them. Which group can hurt the firm most if ignored?
  4. Judge on that ranking. “The decision is justified because it protects the group the firm cannot afford to lose” is a proper conclusion.
  5. Add a time frame. Upsetting staff may be survivable this month and fatal next year.

Shareholder and stakeholder are not the same word

A shareholder has bought part of a company and owns a slice of it. A stakeholder simply has something at stake. Every shareholder is therefore a stakeholder, but the reverse is almost never true — your customers, your cleaner’s employment agency and your local council all have stakes and own nothing.

The relationship all shareholders are stakeholders, but most stakeholders are not shareholders

The confusion matters because the two words point at different priorities. “Shareholder value” means running the firm to make owners richer. “Stakeholder value” means balancing the owners against everyone else. Firms genuinely disagree about which they follow, and that disagreement is examinable.

EXAM-STYLE

Distinguish between internal and external stakeholders of a supermarket chain. [4]

Define the split Internal stakeholders belong to the organisation; external ones are affected by it from outside. Internal, applied to the supermarket Shelf staff and store managers are employed by the chain, and shareholders own it. Their income depends on the firm trading well. External, applied to the supermarket Farmers who supply produce, shoppers, and the council granting planning permission all deal with the chain from outside it. The difference is membership of the organisation, not how close the contact is a daily delivery driver from a haulage firm is still external
EXAM-STYLE

Explain why a firm might prioritise one stakeholder group over another. [6]

A bakery chain is deciding whether to close two loss-making branches.

Resources are limited It cannot keep the branches open, protect the jobs and still pay a dividend, so somebody loses. Power decides the order shareholders can replace the directors → their view carries most weight the affected staff have high interest but very little formal power. Survival comes before preference If losses continue, every stakeholder loses, so protecting the firm’s finances can be defended even by those it hurts. But the ranking is not permanent Poor treatment of staff damages recruitment and service quality, which eventually reaches the customer and the shareholder. Firms prioritise the group whose withdrawal would do the most immediate damage

💡 Exam tip

⚠ Common mix-up

Up next: When Stakeholder Interests Pull Apart — now that you can name the groups, we look at what happens when two of them want opposite things from the same decision, and how firms actually settle it.

Want this explained one-to-one?

Book a free session with an experienced IB Business Management tutor and get your trickiest topics made simple.

Book a Free Session →