IB Psychology SL Topic 1 — Mental Health Disorders Paper 1 & 2 Sociocultural approach ~10 min read

How Cultures Differ in Defining Mental Illness

Diagnosis feels like a medical fact: you either have the illness or you do not. But a diagnosis is a judgement made by a person, using a checklist written by other people, in a particular culture. Change any part of that and the answer can change too.

📚 What you need to know

Why diagnosis is not neutral

Two things have to happen for a diagnosis. Someone has to show symptoms, and someone else has to notice and interpret them. The second step is where bias gets in.

🧩 What goes wrong when bias enters the room

  1. Patients feel dismissed or unheard, and start doubting whether their symptoms are even serious.
  2. Patients receive the wrong treatment, or no treatment at all, which can make the condition worse.
  3. At a wider level, prevalence rates get recorded incorrectly, which feeds discrimination and prejudice back into the system.

Where does the bias come from? Partly from cultural stereotypes — assumptions about the intelligence, ability or behaviour of certain groups. And partly from the biomedical model itself, which grew up in Western, individualistic cultures and can quietly carry gender and cultural bias into diagnosis.

Etic and emic

These two words are worth memorising precisely, because examiners use them and students confuse them constantly.

The difference in one line Etic = judging from outside with one shared standard  •  Emic = understanding from inside that culture
Two ways to decide what counts as abnormal The behaviour stays the same; only the measuring stick changes ETIC: one standard EMIC: judged within one culture’s idea of normal each culture uses its own norms A B C A B C fits fits abnormal fits fits fits measured from outside understood from inside risk: misdiagnosis reduces misdiagnosis Culture C did not change. The measuring stick did. Culture bias is what happens when only one stick is allowed.
Culture bias is more likely to affect collectivist cultures, which may rely on culture-bound concepts and traditional treatments rather than the biomedical model.

Two real examples

The second example is the cleaner one for an essay. In that culture, distress is expressed through the body. A clinician trained to expect distress to be expressed in words about feelings sees something unfamiliar and reaches for the most serious label available. Nothing about the patient was psychotic. The mismatch was between the expression and the expectation.

🔬 Jenkins-Hall & Sacco (1991)

A controlled test of bias in diagnosis

AIM
To investigate cultural bias in diagnosing depression.
PARTICIPANTS
62 White US psychotherapists (39 female, 23 male; average age 36). All held master’s degrees and had at least three years of practice.
PROCEDURE
Each therapist watched a 3-minute video of a staged consultation. The independent variable had four conditions: a White female “depressed” client, a Black female “depressed” client, a White female “nondepressed” client, and a Black female “nondepressed” client. It was an independent measures design, so each therapist saw only one condition. Scripts were based on standardised depression inventories covering low mood, loss of interest and poor sleep. Therapists then rated the client on depressive symptoms, social skills and psychological state.
RESULTS
All depressed clients were correctly diagnosed. Non-depressed White and Black clients were rated similarly. But Black depressed clients were rated lower for social skills and likeability and more negatively overall than White depressed clients. Being both Black and depressed produced the most negative ratings of all.
CONCLUSION
The therapists showed racial bias, and that bias could lead to adverse or harmful treatment outcomes.
Look carefully at the pattern, because it is more interesting than “therapists were biased”. The diagnosis was accurate every time, and the non-depressed clients were rated the same regardless of race. Bias only appeared in the judgements around the diagnosis, and only for the depressed Black client. That combination is called an interaction effect, and pointing it out will separate you from every other candidate.

Why that matters practically

If bias sits in the ratings of social skills and likeability rather than the diagnosis itself, it will not show up in any diagnostic statistic. It will show up in how the person is treated afterwards: how much time they get, how their progress is judged, how seriously their setbacks are taken. That is a far harder problem to audit.

Evaluating this research

StrengthsLimitations
The findings support previous research, reinforcing the validity of cultural differences in mental health diagnosis. Some participants may have realised the consultations were fake, giving rise to demand characteristics.
Standardised rating scales were used, an example of data triangulation that raises validity and reliability. A 3-minute video is nothing like a real course of therapy, so ecological validity is low.
Controlling everything except the client’s race isolates the variable cleanly. Research on cultural differences is socially sensitive and risks being misused to reinforce stereotypes about minority groups.
Independent measures prevented therapists comparing conditions and guessing the aim. All therapists were White and US-based, so the findings cannot be generalised to other systems.

Linking to the concepts

EXAM ANSWER

Discuss the role of culture in the diagnosis of one disorder. [22 marks]

Define the problem precisely Culture bias is assuming one culture defines normality, so behaviour outside it looks abnormal. It enters diagnosis through an etic approach. Give a concrete case Puerto Rican patients expressing distress physically have been misread as psychotic by US clinicians. Evidence with the detail that counts Jenkins-Hall & Sacco: diagnosis was accurate, but Black depressed clients were rated lower on social skills and likeability than White depressed clients. Evaluate the method honestly A staged 3-minute video limits ecological validity, and demand characteristics are possible. Conclude: an emic approach and researcher reflexivity are the fix naming a solution, not just a problem, is what “discuss” is really asking for

💡 Exam tips

⚠ Common mix-ups

Up next: Operant Conditioning as an Explanation of Depression — back to the individual, but with a very different question: what if depression is partly kept going by what the world does and does not reward?

Want this explained one-to-one?

Book a free session with an experienced IB Psychology tutor and get your trickiest topics made simple.

Book a Free Session →