IB Maths AA HL Topic 1 — Number & Algebra Paper 1 & 2 ~7 min read

Disproof by Counter Example

A claim that “for all numbers, something is true” is destroyed the moment you find a single number where it isn’t. That single number is called a counterexample, and producing one is a disproof — the opposite of a proof. The skill is two-fold: knowing where to look (which is much easier than it sounds — the suspects are usually the same kind of number every time), and writing the disproof properly so the IB awards full marks.

📘 What you need to know

What is disproof by counterexample?

Suppose someone makes a sweeping claim like “for all real x, x2 > x“. To disprove this, you don’t need an argument that covers every case — you just need one bad apple. Pick x = ½: then x2 = ¼, which is less than ½, not greater. The single example demolishes the claim.

Logic in a nutshell Claim: “for all x in S, P(x) is true”
Disproof: find one x0 ∈ S where P(x0) is false
Conclusion: claim is false ✗

🤔 Why is one counterexample enough?

Because the original claim says every case works. A single failing case shatters that. The mathematics doesn’t ask “how often does the claim work?” — only “does it work for absolutely all cases?”. One “no” turns the answer to “no”.

Where to look — the usual suspects

Most claims that fail break at the same kinds of “edge” numbers. Train your eye to test these first.

0
breaks inequalities and divisions; “always positive” claims often fail here
1
behaves oddly with powers (1n = 1) and fractions (½ behaves like a small number)
2
the only even prime — kills any “all primes are odd” type claim
−1
a small negative number — flips inequalities and signs
½
a fraction in (0, 1) — squaring makes it smaller, not larger
√2 or π
irrational — disproves any “rational” claim
When you see “for all real x“, quickly run through 0, 1, −1, ½, and 2 in your head. One of these will often falsify a careless claim. If those don’t work, try a slightly more exotic value (a small irrational, or a large negative).

How to write a disproof properly

The IB awards marks for the structure as much as the chosen number. A counterexample alone — without showing why it fails — usually scores zero.

🧭 Recipe — disproving a claim

  1. Re-state the claim briefly so it’s clear what you’re disproving.
  2. Choose a candidate number from the usual-suspect list. Try the simplest one that might fail.
  3. Substitute and compute both sides of the claim explicitly. Show the working.
  4. Point out the failure in plain words — “the LHS is X, the RHS is Y, so the claim does not hold for this value”.
  5. Conclude with a line stating the claim has been disproved.
Bare minimum that earns marks:   the chosen value, the substitution, the comparison, and the conclusion. Skipping any one of these typically loses a mark.

Worked examples

WE 1

Disprove a claim about multiples

Disprove the statement: “For every n+, if n is a multiple of 6, then n is also a multiple of 12.”

Step 1: Try a small multiple of 6 let n = 6 Step 2: Check both parts 6 is a multiple of 6 ✓ 6 ÷ 12 = 0.5 → not a whole number, so 6 is NOT a multiple of 12 Step 3: Conclude n = 6 disproves the claim ✗
WE 2

Disprove an inequality claim

Disprove the statement: “For all x, x2 > x.”

Step 1: Try a value in (0, 1) let x = ½ Step 2: Compute both sides x2 = (½)2 = ¼ x = ½ Step 3: Compare ¼ < ½,   so x2 is NOT greater than x x = ½ disproves the claim ✗ x = 0 also works — both make the strict inequality fail. Either is fine.
WE 3

Disprove a claim about squares

Disprove the statement: “For all a, b, if a2 = b2, then a = b.”

Step 1: Use a positive and negative pair let a = 2 and b = −2 Step 2: Check the hypothesis a2 = 4,   b2 = 4,   so a2 = b2 Step 3: Check the conclusion but a = 2 ≠ −2 = b (a, b) = (2, −2) disproves the claim ✗ squaring loses sign information — this is the classic example showing why
WE 4

Disprove a claim about primes

Disprove the statement: “Every prime number is odd.”

Step 1: Try the smallest prime let n = 2 Step 2: Check both properties 2 is prime (its only factors are 1 and 2) ✓ but 2 is even, not odd n = 2 disproves the claim ✗ 2 is the only even prime — that’s why it always wins this type of question
WE 5

Disprove a false algebraic identity

Disprove the statement: “For all a, b, (a + b)2 = a2 + b2.”

Step 1: Try a simple non-zero pair let a = 1, b = 1 Step 2: Compute both sides LHS: (1 + 1)2 = 22 = 4 RHS: 12 + 12 = 1 + 1 = 2 Step 3: Compare 4 ≠ 2, so LHS ≠ RHS for this pair (a, b) = (1, 1) disproves the claim ✗ the missing 2ab term is what makes this claim false; any non-zero pair where both are non-zero will work

💡 Top tips

⚠ Common mistakes

Counterexamples are how mathematicians stress-test claims in everyday work — far before formal proofs. The skill of generating a quick mental list of “suspect values” carries beyond exams: it makes you a sharper thinker about any general claim, mathematical or otherwise.

Need help with Disproof by Counterexample?

Get 1-on-1 help from an IB examiner who knows exactly what Paper 1 & 2 are looking for.

Book Free Session →