IB Business Management HL Topic 5 — Operations Management Paper 1 & 2 Core idea ~9 min read

Deciding Where to Produce

Most operations decisions can be undone. Location cannot — not cheaply. Once a business has signed a lease, fitted out a site and hired local staff, moving again means writing all of that off. That is why examiners treat location as a long-term, high-risk decision, and why “it depends what the business needs most” is the answer they are looking for.

📚 What you need to know

The factors that pull a business one way or another

Proximity to the market

How close the business sits to its customers. Being near them cuts the cost of delivering, shortens delivery times, and for a shop or restaurant it is the whole business — nobody travels an hour for a sandwich. It matters most when the finished product is bulky, fragile or perishable, because those are expensive to move.

Proximity to labour

Being near a pool of workers with the right skills. A software firm needs graduates and tends to cluster near universities or in cities where developers already live. A large warehouse needs a supply of people willing to do shift work nearby. If the skills are not local, the business must either train people or pay to relocate them, and both cost money.

Proximity to materials and suppliers

Being near the inputs. This matters most when the raw material is heavier or bulkier than the finished product, because it is cheaper to move the finished item than the raw material. It also supports just-in-time delivery, which only works when suppliers are close enough to deliver reliably.

Proximity to competitors

This one cuts both ways, which makes it good evaluation material. Some businesses deliberately cluster — car dealerships and furniture shops sit together because customers want to compare in one trip, so the cluster brings more traffic to everyone. Others deliberately avoid rivals, choosing an area nobody serves so they get it to themselves.

Nature of the business activity

What the business physically needs. A manufacturer needs floor space, high ceilings, heavy power supply and room for lorries to turn. A law firm needs a smart, central office that clients can reach easily. Neither would work in the other’s building.

Infrastructure

Roads, ports, rail, power and internet. A distributor needs motorway access; an online business needs reliable, fast connectivity far more than it needs a smart address. Weak infrastructure raises costs quietly and permanently.

Add the cost factors examiners expect. Rent and land prices, local wage rates, business taxes, and government grants offered to attract firms to a region. These are the numbers that decide between two sites that are otherwise equally suitable.

Which factor wins? It depends on what you move

There is a neat rule underneath all of this. A business is pulled towards whichever end of its supply chain is most expensive to transport. If the raw material is heavy and the product is light, sit near the material. If the product is heavy, fragile or perishable, sit near the customer. If neither is expensive to move, the business is free to go almost anywhere — and will then chase cheap rent or skilled staff instead.

What pulls a business where sit near whichever end is more expensive to transport RAW MATERIALS THE MARKET steel mill software studio bakery ore is heavy nothing to move bread goes stale Firms in the middle are free to chase cheap rent or skilled staff which is why software and call centres can be located almost anywhere
Use this to justify a recommendation. Naming which end of the chain is expensive to move turns a list of factors into an argument.

How the decision is actually made

Businesses do not compare every possible site on every factor — that would take forever. They filter. First they rule out anywhere that fails a requirement they cannot live without, then they compare what is left on cost, then they apply judgement.

Narrowing down the site list rule out first, compare second, judge last ALL POSSIBLE SITES anywhere the firm could go MEETS THE MUST-HAVES space, transport links, workers SHORTLIST compare rent, wages, taxes FINAL SITE best fit, not lowest cost The cheapest site on the shortlist is not always the right one the owner’s own preferences and the firm’s image count as well
Notice that cost only appears at stage three. A site that fails a must-have is not a bargain, however cheap the rent is.
In an exam, structure a location answer this way: what must the site have, what will each option cost, and what is this firm’s priority? That order is far more convincing than listing six factors in the order you memorised them.

Quantitative and qualitative factors

Some location factors can be put in a spreadsheet. Rent per square metre, average wages, transport costs, tax rates and grants can all be added up, and the site with the lowest total cost can be identified.

Others cannot. The owner may not want to move their family. Staff may leave rather than relocate, taking their knowledge with them. A prestigious address may support a premium brand in a way no cost sheet captures. And the risk of getting it wrong is itself a qualitative factor, because location is so hard to reverse.

BusinessThe factor that dominatesWhy
Coffee shopProximity to the marketCustomers buy on impulse and will not travel
Cement worksProximity to materialsAggregate is heavy and costly to transport
Software developerProximity to labourThe product moves online, the skills do not
Distribution warehouseInfrastructureEverything depends on motorway and port access
Car dealershipProximity to competitorsBuyers want to compare several in one trip
Fresh fish processorProximity to materialsThe input is perishable and must be handled fast

Worked examples

WORKED EXAMPLE 1

A bottled water company is choosing between a site next to its spring and a site next to its main city market. Recommend a location. [6]

Step 1: what is expensive to move? Water is heavy. Bottling near the spring means transporting full, heavy bottles a long way to customers. Step 2: but check the constraint The water itself must come from the spring, so the raw material has to be moved either way — and moving unbottled water in bulk tankers is cheaper per litre than moving packaged bottles. Step 3: weigh it Bottling near the market cuts the biggest transport bill, but the brand may rely on being bottled at source, which customers value. Recommend bottling at source if the brand sells on purity; otherwise bottle near the market The marks here are for identifying the conflict between transport cost and brand image, not for picking a side.
WORKED EXAMPLE 2

Site A costs $40,000 a year in rent with wages of $260,000. Site B costs $25,000 in rent but wages there are $310,000, and it is 30 minutes further from customers. Which should the firm choose? [6]

Step 1: compare the measurable costs Site A: $40,000 + $260,000 = $300,000 Site B: $25,000 + $310,000 = $335,000 Site A is $35,000 a year cheaper Step 2: add the factor with no price on it Site B is also further from customers, so delivery costs and response times both worsen. Nothing in the figures offsets that. Cheaper rent is a headline that hides the real cost. Always total all the cost lines you are given before judging.

💡 Exam tip

⚠️ Common mix-up

Up next: Outsourcing, Offshoring and Reshoring — what happens when a business decides not to do the work itself, or not to do it at home.

Want this explained one-to-one?

Book a free session with an experienced IB Business Management tutor and get your trickiest topics made simple.

Book a Free Session →