IB Business Management HLTopic 2 — Motivation and DemotivationPaper 1 & 2Core idea~10 min read
Taylor, Maslow and Herzberg Explained
Three people, three completely different answers to the same question: why does anybody work hard? Taylor said money. Maslow said it depends what you are missing. Herzberg said money stops you being unhappy but never makes you happy. All three still turn up in exam papers, and all three still turn up in real workplaces.
📚 What you need to know
Motivation is the inner drive to act. It is intrinsic (from within — interest, pride) or extrinsic (from outside — pay, praise, punishment).
Motivated staff mean higher productivity, better reliability and lower labour turnover.
Taylor: break jobs into simple tasks, train workers in the one best method, and pay by results (piece rate).
Maslow: five levels of need, from physiological up to self-actualisation. Lower needs must be met before higher ones motivate.
Herzberg: hygiene factors (pay, conditions, rules) only remove dissatisfaction. Motivators (achievement, recognition, responsibility) create real satisfaction.
Herzberg’s key claim: fixing pay stops people being unhappy, but it does not make them motivated.
Why motivation matters to a business
Productivity: engaged staff take initiative and produce more and better output, which raises profit.
Reliability: motivated people turn up on time, hit deadlines and take fewer sick days.
Turnover: people who want to be there stay, so recruitment and training costs fall.
Taylor: scientific management
Frederick Taylor, writing in the early twentieth century, assumed workers are motivated almost entirely by money. If that is true, the job of management is to find the most efficient way to work and then pay people for output.
🧩 Taylor’s four steps
Study the work. Analyse each step and find the most efficient way to do it.
Standardise it. Write detailed procedures so every worker follows the same method.
Select and train. Choose workers with the right abilities and train them in that one method.
Pay by results. Use piece rate or bonuses so output and pay rise together.
Strengths of Taylor’s approach
Weaknesses
Efficiency rises and cost per unit falls.
Overemphasis on efficiency kills satisfaction and creativity.
Standard procedures reduce errors and inconsistency.
Workers disengage when treated as parts of a machine.
Specialisation makes workers highly skilled at their one task.
Useless for jobs needing creativity, problem-solving or people skills.
Clear training improves performance and confidence.
Open to exploitation: more work extracted without fair pay.
Taylor gets mocked in modern textbooks, but look at a supermarket warehouse or a fast-food kitchen. Timed tasks, one best method, pay linked to output. His ideas never left; they just got software.
Maslow: the hierarchy of needs
Maslow argued human needs come in levels. A need that is already met stops motivating you — which is why a pay rise thrills someone struggling with rent and barely registers with someone comfortable.
The practical use in an exam: work out which level the case study staff are stuck at. If people fear redundancy they are on the safety level, and no amount of praise will fix that.
Strengths of Maslow
Weaknesses
Higher satisfaction raises productivity and lowers turnover.
One size does not fit all: needs differ from person to person.
Gives managers a way to target incentives at real needs.
Meeting many individual needs is expensive.
Explains why the same reward works for one person and not another.
Time-consuming: managers must know each employee well.
Herzberg: two factors, not one scale
Herzberg’s discovery was that satisfaction and dissatisfaction are not opposite ends of one line. They are two separate scales, driven by different things.
This is why a pay rise cheers people up for about a month. It removed a complaint; it did not add anything interesting to the job.
How a business uses Herzberg. First remove the dissatisfiers: fair pay, decent conditions, secure contracts. Then add motivators: recognition schemes, real responsibility, growth plans and challenging work. Doing the second without the first does not work — nobody is inspired by a “responsibility opportunity” while underpaid.
WORKED EXAMPLE
A call centre pays above the market rate but has 40% annual staff turnover. Exit interviews mention boredom and no chance of promotion. Use Herzberg to explain the problem. (4 marks)
Step 1: the hygiene factors are fine
Above-market pay means staff are not dissatisfied about money. That has moved them to neutral, and neutral is as far as pay can take them.
Step 2: the motivators are missing
Boredom means the work itself offers no achievement, and no promotion route means no recognition or growth. With no motivators, staff have nothing holding them, so they leave for the first job that looks more interesting.
Pay is a hygiene factor, and hygiene factors do not motivateThe clue “pays above market but still loses staff” is Herzberg’s theory written into the question. Spot it and the answer writes itself.
WORKED EXAMPLE
Recommend two changes the call centre could make. (6 marks)
Change 1: enrich the job
Let experienced staff handle complex complaints end to end rather than reading a script. That adds achievement and responsibility, both Herzberg motivators, at almost no cost.
Change 2: build a promotion ladder
Create team-leader and trainer roles so staff can see a route upward. This meets esteem needs in Maslow’s terms as well as Herzberg’s recognition.
Enrich the work first, since it is cheaper and fasterNotice the recommendation is justified on cost and speed, not just on theory. Judgement needs a reason attached.
💡 Exam tip
Diagnose with the theory, do not just describe it. Say which level or which factor the case study staff are stuck on.
Look for the classic clue: good pay but high turnover. That is always Herzberg.
Use two theories together where you can. Recognition is a Herzberg motivator and a Maslow esteem need at the same time.
Match the theory to the job: Taylor still fits repetitive production work; Herzberg fits skilled and professional roles.
Mention cost. Motivators like responsibility and recognition are often cheaper than pay rises, which is a strong evaluation point.
Remember motivation is personal. Assuming everyone in a team wants the same thing is how reward schemes fail.
⚠️ Common mix-up
Saying pay is a motivator for Herzberg. It is a hygiene factor. This single error costs marks every year.
Treating Maslow’s levels as fixed. People move up and down as circumstances change.
Confusing intrinsic and extrinsic. Intrinsic comes from the work itself; extrinsic comes from outside it.
Dismissing Taylor completely. Piece rate still runs whole industries.
Job enlargement is not job enrichment. Enlargement adds more tasks at the same level; enrichment adds responsibility.
Writing the theory with no business. Every point must land on the case study.
Up next: The Later Motivation Theories — McClelland, Deci and Ryan, Adams and Vroom, and what they added once psychologists stopped assuming everyone wants the same thing.
Want this explained one-to-one?
Book a free session with an experienced IB Business Management tutor and get your trickiest topics made simple.
