IB Chemistry HL Topic 4 — Entropy & Spontaneity Paper 1 & 2 Core skill ~12 min read

Gibbs Free Energy and the Equilibrium Constant

Two ideas you have always kept in separate boxes turn out to be the same idea. ΔG° tells you which way a reaction wants to go. K tells you where it ends up. One short equation joins them, and once you have it you can work out an equilibrium constant without doing a single experiment.

📚 What you need to know

Free energy runs downhill into a valley

Up to now you have used ΔG° as a yes-or-no verdict. That is a bit of a simplification. What actually happens is that free energy falls as the reaction proceeds, and it does not fall forever — it reaches a minimum and stops. Once the mixture sits at the bottom, nothing more happens overall, because moving in either direction would mean going uphill.

That bottom of the valley is equilibrium. And where the bottom sits — near the products end or near the reactants end — is precisely what K is telling you.

Where the valley bottom sits is what K measures Free energy falls as the reaction runs, then stops at its lowest point ΔG° negative: K > 1 ΔG° positive: K < 1 Gibbs free energy Gibbs free energy reactants products reactants products extent of reaction extent of reaction The teal dot is equilibrium: the lowest free energy the mixture can reach. Notice neither dot sits at the very end. Nothing goes fully to completion.
Both reactions start by going downhill. The difference is where the bottom is. On the left the mixture ends up mostly products; on the right it barely gets going before it settles.
This picture clears up something that bothers a lot of students. A reaction with a positive ΔG° is not frozen — a tiny bit of product still forms, because even that small step downhill lowers the free energy. It just does not get far, which is another way of saying K is small.

The equation that joins them

Because the bottom of the valley is fixed by how negative ΔG° is, there has to be a direct link between ΔG° and K. Here it is.

Both forms are in the data booklet ΔG° = −RT ln K — or — ln K = −ΔG° ÷ RT

Read the minus sign carefully, because it does all the work. A negative ΔG° makes −ΔG°/RT positive, so ln K is positive, so K is bigger than 1. Products win. Flip the sign of ΔG° and every step flips with it.

One number line, two ways of saying the same thing The sign of ΔG° and the size of K are locked together ΔG° negative ΔG° positive K > 1: mostly products K < 1: mostly reactants ΔG° = 0, so K = 1 The link is logarithmic, so small changes in ΔG° swing K a long way. At 298 K, only −17 kJ mol⁻¹ already gives K of about a thousand.
Because of the logarithm, free energy changes that look modest produce enormous equilibrium constants. That is worth remembering when a question asks you to comment on the size of K.

How big is big? A feel for the numbers

All of these are worked out at 298 K, so RT = 8.31 × 298 = 2476 J mol−1.

ΔG° / kJ mol−1K at 298 KWhat the mixture looks like
−34about 106Essentially all products
−17about 103Mostly products
01A real mixture of both
+17about 10−3Mostly reactants
+34about 10−6Barely any product at all
Notice the pattern. Every 17 kJ mol−1 change in ΔG° multiplies or divides K by about a thousand. So a reaction with ΔG° of −5 kJ mol−1 is genuinely reversible, while one at −50 kJ mol−1 goes to completion for all practical purposes.

🧩 Finding K from ΔG°

  1. Convert ΔG° into joules by multiplying by 1000. R is in joules, so this is the opposite of what you did on the Gibbs page.
  2. Check T is in kelvin.
  3. Work out ln K = −ΔG° ÷ (RT), watching the double negative.
  4. Take e to that power to get K. On your calculator that is the ex button, not 10x.
  5. Comment on the value. Bigger than 1 means products favoured; smaller means reactants.

What if the mixture is not at equilibrium?

ΔG° is the standard value: it assumes everything at 1 mol dm−3 or 100 kPa. A real flask is almost never in that state, so we need the version that uses the concentrations you actually have. That is where the reaction quotient, Q, comes in. It is worked out exactly like K, but with whatever concentrations are in the flask right now.

Free energy away from equilibrium ΔG = ΔG° + RT ln Q

Put Q = K into that equation and set ΔG = 0, because at equilibrium there is no push either way. You get 0 = ΔG° + RT ln K, which rearranges straight back to ΔG° = −RT ln K. The two equations are the same idea seen from different places on the valley slope.

Compare Q with KSign of ΔGWhat happens next
Q < KNegativeForward reaction runs, making more product
Q = KZeroAt equilibrium, no net change
Q > KPositiveReverse reaction runs, remaking reactants

Worked examples

WORKED EXAMPLE

For N2(g) + 3H2(g) → 2NH3(g), ΔG° = −32.7 kJ mol−1 at 298 K. Calculate K and comment on the position of equilibrium. (R = 8.31 J K−1 mol−1)

Step 1: get ΔG° into joules −32.7 × 1000 = −32700 J mol⁻¹ Step 2: use ln K = −ΔG° ÷ RT ln K = −(−32700) ÷ (8.31 × 298) = 32700 ÷ 2476 Step 3: work out ln K, then K ln K = 13.2, so K = e13.2 = 5.4 × 10⁵ K ≈ 5.4 × 10⁵, so equilibrium lies far to the products side Which raises an obvious question: if K is that big at room temperature, why is the Haber process run at 450 °C? Because K says nothing about rate. At 298 K you would wait forever.
WORKED EXAMPLE

A reaction has K = 4.5 × 10−3 at 500 K. Calculate ΔG° at this temperature.

Step 1: pick the right form We have K and want ΔG°, so use ΔG° = −RT ln K Step 2: find ln K ln (4.5 × 10⁻³) = −5.40 Step 3: substitute ΔG° = −(8.31 × 500 × −5.40) = +22452 J mol⁻¹ ΔG° = +22.5 kJ mol⁻¹ K smaller than 1 always gives a positive ΔG°. If your signs disagree with that, you have lost a minus sign somewhere.
WORKED EXAMPLE

For H2(g) + I2(g) ⇌ 2HI(g), ΔG° = −8.0 kJ mol−1 at 700 K. A flask contains [H2] = 0.20, [I2] = 0.10 and [HI] = 0.20 mol dm−3. Find ΔG and say which way the reaction goes.

Step 1: write and work out Q Q = [HI]² ÷ ([H₂][I₂]) = 0.20² ÷ (0.20 × 0.10) Q = 0.040 ÷ 0.020 = 2.0 Step 2: use ΔG = ΔG° + RT ln Q, in kJ RT ln Q = (8.31 × 700 × ln 2.0) ÷ 1000 = +4.03 kJ mol⁻¹ Step 3: add them ΔG = −8.0 + 4.03 = −3.97 kJ mol⁻¹ ΔG is negative, so the forward reaction keeps going Divide the RT ln Q term by 1000 because R is in joules while ΔG° is in kilojoules. Same trap as the Gibbs page, opposite direction.

💡 Exam tip

⚠ Common mix-up

That closes the loop on this topic: entropy explains why things spread out, Gibbs free energy weighs that against enthalpy, and K tells you where the balance lands. Up next: Features of Dynamic Equilibrium, where we look at that balance point from the kinetics side.

Want this explained one-to-one?

Book a free session with an experienced IB Chemistry tutor and get your trickiest topics made simple.

Book a Free Session →