Governments borrow. That is normal and often sensible — you would not pay for a hospital that lasts fifty years out of a single year’s taxes. The objective is not zero debt. It is debt the country can comfortably keep paying, without the interest bill crowding out everything else.
📚 What you need to know
Government debt is the total amount owed to creditors, at home and abroad. It is a stock.
A budget deficit is one year’s spending minus one year’s revenue. It is a flow.
Deficits add to the debt; surpluses can pay it down.
Debt is measured against the size of the economy: the debt-to-GDP ratio.
Sustainable means the government can manage repayments without putting the economy at risk.
High debt brings higher borrowing costs, austerity, crowding out, and a burden on future taxpayers.
Deficit and debt are not the same thing
This distinction is worth marks in almost every essay on the topic, and it is easy once you picture it.
Politicians often announce that they have “cut the debt” when they have really cut the deficit. The tank is still filling, just more slowly.
Measuring it: the debt-to-GDP ratio
The raw number is meaningless on its own. A trillion dollars of debt is crushing for a small country and trivial for a large one. So debt is expressed as a share of annual output.
Debt-to-GDP ratio
debt-to-GDP ratio = (total government debt ÷ GDP) × 100
WORKED EXAMPLE
Working with the ratio
Country M has government debt of $1.8 trillion and GDP of $2.4 trillion. (a) Calculate the debt-to-GDP ratio. (b) Next year GDP grows to $2.6 trillion while debt rises to $1.9 trillion. Calculate the new ratio and comment.
(a) This year(1.8 ÷ 2.4) × 100 = 75%(b) Next year(1.9 ÷ 2.6) × 100 = 73.08%CommentThe debt grew, but the ratio fellGDP grew faster than the debt did. This is how countries usually reduce their debt burden — by growing out of it rather than paying it off.
The 90% rule of thumb. Studies of the past fifty years suggest debt often becomes hard to sustain once it passes about 90% of GDP. Treat it as a warning sign, not a law — some countries carry far more without a crisis because investors trust them.
Why sustainable debt is an objective
Reason
What it means in practice
Economic stability
Manageable debt keeps interest rates and the exchange rate steadier
Fiscal sustainability
Money can go to schools and infrastructure instead of interest payments
Fairness between generations
Today’s borrowing is repaid by tomorrow’s taxpayers, who had no vote on it
Effective monetary policy
Heavy borrowing pushes interest rates up and limits what the central bank can do
Less external vulnerability
Owing large sums abroad hands foreign creditors influence over your policy
What goes wrong when debt gets too high
Consequence
How it works
Higher borrowing costs
Lenders see more risk of default, so they demand a higher interest rate — which makes the debt harder to service
Austerity
Contractionary fiscal policy: higher taxes and lower spending, which reduces AD and can deepen a downturn
Crowding out
Government competes with firms for the limited pool of savings, pushing real interest rates up and squeezing private investment
Less room to respond
A heavily indebted government cannot borrow much more when the next recession arrives
Burden on the future
Future generations face higher taxes or worse public services
There is a nasty feedback loop here. High debt raises the interest rate the government pays; higher interest payments widen the deficit; a wider deficit adds to the debt. Countries that have gone through a debt crisis usually describe exactly this spiral.
The other side of the argument
Examiners reward balance, and there is a serious case for borrowing:
Capital spending pays for itself. Borrowing to build a port or a university raises LRAS, so future GDP is bigger and the ratio falls.
Recessions are the wrong time for austerity. Cutting spending when AD is already weak can shrink GDP faster than it shrinks debt, so the ratio rises.
Who you owe matters. Debt owed to your own citizens in your own currency is far less dangerous than debt owed abroad in a foreign currency.
Interest rates matter more than the level. If the interest rate is below the growth rate, a country can carry high debt comfortably.
💡 Exam tip
Define deficit and debt separately at the start of any essay on this topic. It is a quick, reliable mark.
Always express debt as a ratio to GDP, never as a raw figure.
Remember the ratio can fall because GDP grew, with no debt repaid at all.
Distinguish current from capital spending — borrowing for investment is a much stronger case.
Bring in crowding out by name; it links this page to interest rates and investment.
For evaluation, ask who the debt is owed to and in which currency.
⚠️ Common mix-up
Using deficit and debt as synonyms. One is a yearly flow, the other a total stock.
Thinking a smaller deficit reduces the debt. Any deficit still adds to it.
Treating 90% as an exact cut-off. It is a rough guide, not a rule.
Assuming all government borrowing is wasteful. Capital spending can raise future output.
Ignoring the currency. Debt in your own currency is far easier to manage.
Recommending austerity in a recession without mentioning the effect on AD and unemployment.
Up next: Conflicts Between Macroeconomic Objectives — the trade-offs that make a finance minister’s job impossible, and the Phillips curve that describes the biggest one.
Want this explained one-to-one?
Book a free session with an experienced IB Economics tutor and get your trickiest topics made simple.
