IB Economics SL & HL Topic 5 — Exam Skills and Assessment Paper 2 Exam technique ~8 min read

What Paper 2 Asks For

Paper 2 gives you a text, some data and a set of questions built on top of them. The economics is the same economics you already know. What changes is that every answer has to be tied back to the material in front of you — and the single biggest reason students lose marks here is running out of time before the part that matters most.

📚 What you need to know

How the marks are split

Look at where the marks actually are. The six short subparts together are worth 25 marks, and the final subpart alone is worth 15. That one answer is bigger than any other single thing you write in the whole paper.

Where the 40 marks sit one question, seven subparts, one very large ending (a) to (f) — 25 marks (g) — 15 marks six short answers, 2 to 4 marks each one long evaluation precision wins marks here judgement wins marks here Part (g) is worth more than three short subparts put together. Anything that eats into the time you have left for it is costing you marks.
The short subparts feel safe and satisfying, which is exactly why students overspend on them.

Subparts (a) to (f): short and exact

These are quick questions with a clear right answer. They usually ask you to define a term, pull a figure out of a table, do a small calculation, sketch a diagram, or explain something in two or three sentences.

Treat (a) to (f) like a warm-up, not a performance. Get them right, get them done, and protect the clock. The examiner cannot give you extra credit for a beautifully long answer to a 2-mark question.

Part (g): the 15-mark answer

Part (g) asks you to evaluate something using the stimulus. This is where the paper is really decided. It is not a Paper 1 essay with a few numbers sprinkled on top — the data has to drive the argument.

Think of it as answering two questions at once: what does economic theory say? and what does this particular text and data say? A top-band answer keeps the two moving together, sentence by sentence.

The part (g) test theory  +  the stimulus  +  a judgement  =  top band
The rule that catches people out: explaining the theory correctly but never using the text or the figures caps your marks. Accurate economics is not enough on its own in Paper 2.

Spending the 105 minutes

One hour forty-five sounds generous until you notice how much reading there is. Give yourself a proper read of the stimulus at the start — you will answer (a) to (f) faster if you already know what is in the text.

A workable plan for 105 minutes the aim is to reach part (g) with 40 minutes still on the clock Read text, tables and figures 10 min Answer (a) to (f) 45 min Plan and write part (g) 40 min Check units and labels 10 min Set an alarm in your head: (a) to (f) done by the 55 minute mark. If you are still on (d) at that point, speed up rather than perfect it.
Overspending on calculations and diagrams early on is the classic way to arrive at part (g) with fifteen minutes left.

Worked examples

WORKED EXAMPLE

Matching each subpart to the right piece of the stimulus

The stimulus is a text about a government subsidy for electric buses, plus a table of passenger numbers and a chart of city air pollution. Where does each subpart get its material from?

(a) Define the term subsidy [2] From your own knowledge — but use the bus context in the wording. (b) Using the table, calculate the percentage change in passengers [2] Table only. Quote the two figures you used. (c) Draw a diagram to show the effect of the subsidy [4] Your own diagram, labelled with the market from the text. (g) Evaluate the subsidy [15] Text + table + chart, all three. Pollution figures support the benefit side, cost figures support the drawback side. Every subpart has a source Before writing, jot the source next to each subpart number. It takes 30 seconds.
WORKED EXAMPLE

You have 25 minutes left and part (g) is untouched. What now?

You are on subpart (f), the clock says 80 minutes gone, and part (g) is still blank. Do you finish (f) properly or move on?

Step 1: compare what is at stake Finishing (f) perfectly might win 1 or 2 marks. Part (g) is worth 15. Step 2: move immediately Leave (f) as it is. Spend 3 minutes planning (g): one point for, one point against, two figures from the data, one judgement. Step 3: write in short paragraphs Each paragraph: make the point → explain with theory → quote a figure → say what it means. A rushed (g) still beats a perfect (f) Half of a 15-mark answer is worth more than all of a 2-mark one.

💡 Exam tip

⚠ Common mix-up

Up next: What Paper 3 Asks For — the HL-only paper, where the maths stops being a side dish and becomes the main course.

Want this explained one-to-one?

Book a free session with an experienced IB Economics tutor and get your trickiest topics made simple.

Book a Free Session →