IB Psychology SL Topic 2 — Human Development Paper 1 & 2 Cognitive approach ~13 min read

Piaget’s Stages of Cognitive Development

Piaget’s claim was not that young children know less than adults. It was that they think in a completely different way — and that the way changes in a fixed order. The famous tasks in this page are designed to make that difference visible in about thirty seconds.

📘 What you need to know

Schemas: the child’s filing system

A schema is a mental file for a kind of thing. A toddler has a “dog” file: four legs, fur, barks. Every new animal gets checked against the files.

Assimilation

The new thing gets pushed into a file that already exists.

Example: the toddler sees a sheep and says “dog”. Four legs, fur — close enough. The file did not have to change.

Accommodation

The file itself has to be rewritten because the new thing does not fit.

Example: someone says “that’s a sheep, it says baa”. Now a new file is made and the dog file gets a stricter rule.

Assimilation keeps your existing ideas and squeezes the world into them. Accommodation changes your ideas to match the world. Almost every learning moment is a mix of the two, and the uncomfortable feeling when something does not fit is what pushes development forward.
Piaget’s framework Genetic epistemology — knowledge is built by the child’s own drive to explore, unfolding through age-related stages rather than being poured in by adults.

The four stages

Piaget’s four stages, in fixed order Every child goes through all four, in this sequence, though not always at the same age Sensorimotor 0–2 years Pre-operational 2–7 years Concrete operational 7–11 years Formal operational 11 years and up object permanence egocentrism ends conservation abstract thinking You cannot skip a step The order is fixed; the ages are averages, not deadlines.
The key marker under each step is the ability a child gains by the end of that stage. Examiners often ask for exactly these.
StageAgeWhat thinking is likeKey marker
Sensorimotor0–2 yearsThe child knows the world through senses and movement. Thinking happens through doing.Object permanence at around 8 months — things still exist when hidden.
Pre-operational2–7 yearsLanguage explodes. Pretend play, treating objects as if alive, early ideas of time.Egocentrism fades; the child starts to see other viewpoints.
Concrete operational7–11 yearsLogical thinking works, but only about real, concrete things in front of them.Conservation of number, mass and volume is understood.
Formal operational11 years and upAbstract and hypothetical reasoning. Systematic problem solving and arguing about ideas.Abstract reasoning — thinking about things that are not there.
Object permanence and the A-not-B task. A toy is hidden under cloth A several times, then, while the baby watches, hidden under cloth B. A baby who still reaches for A has not fully worked out that objects keep existing independently of the baby’s own actions.

The conservation task

This is the most famous demonstration in developmental psychology, and it takes two glasses of juice.

🧩 How the task is run

  1. Show two equal amounts side by side — two identical glasses filled to the same line.
  2. Ask first: does this one have more, does that one have more, or are they the same?
  3. Change one while the child watches. Pour one glass into a taller, thinner one.
  4. Ask exactly the same question again.
  5. Judge the answer. “Still the same” = pass. “The tall one has more” = fail.
The conservation task, step by step Nothing is added or taken away — only the shape of the container changes Two identical glasses Poured into a taller glass child says: they are the same child says: the tall one has more Fooled by appearance = still pre-operational Passing needs a reverse operation The child has to imagine pouring it back to see that nothing changed.
The liquid in the tall glass really does look like more. Passing means trusting logic over what your eyes are telling you — which is genuinely hard at five.

The three mountains task

This one tests egocentrism: the inability to picture a scene from anywhere except where you are sitting.

🧩 How the task is run

  1. Show a model of three mountains with different features — a hut, a tree, some snow.
  2. Place a doll on the far side, looking at the model from a different angle.
  3. Ask: what does the doll see?
  4. Offer photographs of the model taken from several positions and let the child choose.
  5. Judge: around age 4 children usually pick their own view. By 7 or 8, most pick the doll’s.
Notice what all three tasks have in common. Each one asks the child to hold two things in mind at once — the appearance and the reality, their view and the doll’s, the part and the whole. That is really what Piaget’s stages are tracking.

The class inclusion task

This tests whether a child can see that a smaller group sits inside a bigger one.

The class inclusion task Can the child see that the small group sits inside the big group? daffodils (5) poppies (3) flowers (8) Are there more daffodils, or more flowers? “more flowers” = pass “more daffodils” = fail The part cannot be bigger than the whole Failing shows the child is comparing daffodils with poppies, not with flowers.
Children who fail are not being silly. They hear “more daffodils or more flowers” as “more yellow ones or more red ones”, because holding a category inside a category is the skill still missing.

Evaluating Piaget’s theory

StrengthsLimitations
Testable. The tasks are simple, standardised and easy to repeat, so the findings are reliable.Underplays language. Children may fail because of how the question is worded, not because the logic is missing.
Groundbreaking. It changed how psychology and schools view children, and sparked decades of research.Weak original evidence. His early ideas came from a small, unrepresentative sample of Swiss children, including his own.
Practical impact. Age-appropriate curricula and hands-on primary teaching grew directly out of this work.Underestimates children. Simplified versions of his tasks are passed by much younger children than he claimed.
Clear predictions. Because the stages are ordered, the theory can be proved wrong — a mark of good science.Ignores the social side. Vygotsky’s criticism: children do not develop alone, and Piaget barely uses other people.

Link to concepts

Exam practice

EXAM QUESTION

Contrast two models of human development. [22]

“Contrast” means differences only. Do not waste half the essay listing what Piaget and Vygotsky agreed on.

Set up both models briefly Piaget: maturational stages, child as little scientist. Vygotsky: social, ZPD and scaffolding. Contrast 1 — what drives development Piaget: biology sets the pace → learning follows. Vygotsky: interaction leads → development follows. Contrast 2 — the role of other people Piaget: children discover alone. Vygotsky: an MKO is essential. Contrast 3 — stages Piaget has four fixed stages; Vygotsky has none. Contrast 4 — culture Piaget assumes one universal sequence; Vygotsky expects development to differ by culture. Support each contrast with a study, not just an assertion conservation task for Piaget, Conner & Cross for Vygotsky

💡 Exam tips

⚠ Common mix-ups

Up next: Theory of Mind: Understanding Other Minds — egocentrism was Piaget’s word for it, but the modern research asks the same question with much sharper tasks.

Want this explained one-to-one?

Book a free session with an experienced IB Psychology tutor and get your trickiest topics made simple.

Book a Free Session →